Search results

Ya for it to be of benefit you got to look into it and get it right.

Matthew 18:11 was not deleted or removed….it was not there to begin with. The newer translations try to be truer to the Word of God, rather than the words of men. LOL words of men....cannot blame this one on the women, guys. The whole of Chapter 18 is in the NASB but noted that 18:11 is not in...

It is a little frustrating and I try to see the humor in it. Why spew garbage? I imagine some do it in an attempt to deceive but mostly they do it out of ignorance and laziness. Ignorant because they do not know and lazy because they do not look into it….It is easier to just talk nonsense...

Hugs to you also.... The Food Pyramid was not designed to create obesity and health problems. As a whole the food pyramid subscribes to the belief that we should eat from all five food groups…..Fruits, Vegetables, Grains, Meat and Dairy. It does not subscribe to gluttony and no exercise. And...

There are translations that will not include obvious additions to the texts. The NASB will but these scriptures in brackets and note that they were not in the older texts.

This why I do not like talking to you......you have no clue.....so you are free to say anything.....no credibility. I have already explained this to you but it is like talking to a bowling ball. I will stand with the scholars. The older texts are not as refined and that is how they know that...

Never said that that fornication simply applied to two single people having sex. The KJV uses the word for all sorts of sexual misconduct even though it is not an actual biblical word. Nelson Bible Dictionary….. 1. Sexual relationships outside the bonds of marriage. Webster’s fornication...

I gave you a name….George. Because you are looking for a name that means you do not have an understanding of the topic. Some of the oldest Christian writings are complete texts and some are fragments. The primary point is that newer more accurate translations do not use newer or Catholic texts...

Did what I explain in detail go over your head?

My problem with you is that your responses are a defense mechanism for ignorance. Go find this information on your own….you will learn things along the way.

The first recorded use of the word fornicate in English is in the 14th century in a poem called the Cursor Mundi. The first English Bibles to use the word fornication was the Bishop’s Bible---Church of England 1568, the Catholic Bible called the Douay-Rheims Bible (early 1600’s) and then the...

George.....LOL Any thing before the 3rd century. You probably need to look at what they called the Christian texts before the 3rd century....You will learn a few things...... As far as Fornication..... Fornication This is a prime example of why we should not make up words and stick them in the...

As I have pointed out after the 5th century there was a lot of fingers in the pie….as far as translations and resources a lot of it was Catholic. The textus receptus of which the KJV relied on heavily was the work of Desiderius Erasmus Roterodamus who was a Dutch Catholic theologian. Which at...

I know the discussions about the King James Version can get heated but if you knew the facts you would know that there is no reason for it. The facts are facts the KJV is really not that accurate and for new Christians it can be hard to read and understand and for that reason it is a favorite...

So you and I do not need to talk....Your question says it all.....you have no clue.

You so funny. Again the words you want are not there and the beliefs you want are not there and the reactions you want are not there. Son of God….My only begotten Son…..second coming….. The prophecy that they would reject their long awaited Messiah….these words and beliefs are not there. …..The...

That would kind of be a play on words but I do not expect you why. You are right.....Yahweh.....not His Son It is kind of like a blind man playing pin the tail on the donkey.

LOL you do not want to get into this discussion with me….it will go south for you real quick.

When you address me that way, you do not know what you are talking about. The NIV leaves out entire verses. LOL This has been explained so many times.....are you dense? The NIV leaves out verses that where not included in older manuscripts. In other words stuff that was added along the way. Is...

You have not compared enough...... Posts 18 and 19.....and 7