Search results

Not so. You just confirmed my Op. This is why so many are rejecting Premil. (1) Premil is totally preoccupied with, and dependent upon, one chapter in the Bible – Revelation 20. It interprets the rest of Scripture in the light of its opinion of one lone highly-debated chapter located in the...

LOL. Exactly: your support for your private opinion of Rev 20 is your private opinion of Rev 20. That is a ridiculous mode of interpretation. That is horrible hermeneutics. This reinforces the Op. Thanks. This is another reason to reject Premil.

No, there is not.

Ok, so you are adding unto Scripture again. That is not smart. You need you answer the question or admit you are wrong. 2+2=4, not 22.

Ok, you have nothing. Just like I thought. The Premil opinion of Rev 20 is totally uncorroboarted.

Where is your corroboration for your opinion of Revelation 20 - that teaches a future thousand years?

Where does it say that "the saints will reign with an Iron Rod" for a thousand years?

So, where else in the New Testament does it teach a future second millennium after the second coming?

Thanks! So, what do you believe?

No, I was not trying to bait. Sorry it felt like that. Ok, so which Premils see the the New Jerusalem coming down at Christ's second coming and not 1,000+ years later? Are you saying this occurs twice - once before and once after the millennium? Or are you saying that some Premils only see it...

So, are you a bot "who copies and posts from his treasured store house of stored posts as fast as any bot can"? LOL. You should think before hurling charges. I think your mask has fell!!! https://www.christianforums.com/threads/undecided-in-eschatology.8267184/page-2#post-77083878

So, are you a bot "who copies and posts from his treasured store house of stored posts as fast as any bot can"? LOL. https://www.christianforums.com/threads/preterists-partial-preterists-and-pre-tribulationists-all-conflate-tribulation-with-gods-wrath.8269888/page-2#post-77125701

LOL. As I thought. This is where Phase 3 kicks in. That was a quick victory! You cannot address the many detailed posts above that expose your error. Premil has no answer to Amil. That is why many are abandoning it. I notice that you cannot even use original language? You always have to...

What Scripture are you talking about that teaches that "the saints will reign with an Iron Rod"?

What? You want me to address all those references that you cut and pasted and refuse to exegete? I don't think so. Exegete all these and I will respond to your exegesis.

What text, what post or what argument have I avoided? I have addressed everything you have presented, and you know it. You are obviously on the ropes.

Lies! The reader can see who is avoiding what above. It matters little what you think. See my detailed responses above. Your back is clearly against the wall. All you are left with is insults and pettiness. I refer you back to the many detailed and avoided posts above.

More avoidance! Address the rebuttals instead of skipping around them. Just because you state something doesn't mean it negates Scripture. Scripture negates your teaching.

Sorry? What are you talking about? If the NJ comes down at the second coming then that obviously negates the Premil thesis. It's that simple!

Premil engagement typically goes like this: Phase 1 is avoidance of the obvious. Phase 2 is insults and ad-hominem. Phase 3 is running. That is because they have no answer for the truth. This is when Amils know the battle is won!