Search results

Saying it doesn’t make it so. You don’t know what fascism is. A fascist would not allow choice on gas stoves and oil.

Trump supporters prefer: American exceptionalism = Liberty over big government. (This includes no deficit and no debt.) A government that serves the people, not the Deep State and global elite. America first over globalism. Peace & prosperity over war and want. (This means American jobs and...

Your reply does not respond to the question. The Courts may have no authority to second guess Congress but US citizens certainly have that authority. Question asked - and evaded. I'm not looking to "strike a balance" between good and evil. 2 Corinthians 6:13-16 Complete Jewish Bible 13 So, just...

Right! Redfan is being obtuse, pretending DENIAL is only a river in Egypt. It reminds me of “Kill all the lawyers” Shakespeare “Henry VI, Part 2,” Act IV, Scene 2

Notice how you rely on case law? Let's examine Article I, Section 4, Clause 1, shall we? The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such...

All you got is talking points while denying the reality in effect for decades. Note how the red States that do not require Voter ID are are Left leaning. That is not a coincidence. Section 8(c)(2)(A) of the National Voter Registration Act (the 90 Day Provision) requires states to “complete...

Appeal to Subjectivism. The Voice of God was heard to speak of wives in unequal ways to husbands. You are hearing ‘wife’ but reading into it both husband and wife - as the only means to support your unbiblical world view. The French have a great saying, Viva La Difference! Having said that...

Oh? Seems that is the very purpose of the statute. This is how case law works, to invoke circular, tortured logic. A court’s decision is used to undercut rational discourse. First, you hid behind the law. Now, you are hiding behind case law to invoke “I was only following orders.” By what...

Let’s examine the statute. What exactly does it say that one could reasonably construe it is meant to maximize voter fraud?

Appeal to Ignorance. Wrong. Words have meaning.

I know what “case law” is and how it is used to subvert law passed by the legislature. See Roe v Wade. Point is, what is this judge doing to protect the integrity of elections in allowing ineligible people (not voters) on registration lists? Hiding behind “I was only following order” is not...

It’s not about belief but facts. Desperation to attempt to change word meanings to “support” your world view.

I am not. Individual v collective metaphors, not withstanding.

I didn't forget anything but it seems you did. Nowhere in your reply does it address the only 2 questions asked: Nowhere does Scripture say the husband is under his wife's authority. Nowhere does Scripture say the wife is free from iniquity. You invoke a verse that states all die in Adam. True...

You are living a lie. "Wife" excludes men. I know you have to make up word meanings to suit your philosophy. It's pretty funny, really.

Yet, few judges do so and make their own law. See so-called case law.

Charging individuals with a crime is secondary. Of primary importance is the sanctity of elections, preventing election fraud. This is analogous to the divergent role of the CIA compared to the FBI. The FBI focuses on prosecuting crime; the CIA focuses on preventing foreign powers from...

Further Biblical evidence of inequality @VictoryinJesus from today's devotional reading. Numbers 5:11-31 New Revised Standard Version Updated Edition Concerning an Unfaithful Wife 11 The Lord spoke to Moses, saying, 12 “Speak to the Israelites and say to them: If any man’s wife goes astray and...

Recently, I learned 2 amazing things: There are 70 million Evangelical Christians, which constitute the largest voting block in America. Only 17% vote. CINO’s, who don’t vote, are making themselves irrelevant in the public square. Such over spiritualization mocks Jesus practical caring for...

What a stupid law. Why are Demonrats against voter ID and protect ineligible “voters” from being removed from registration lists? Fraud. “I was only following orders” is an insufficient defense.