Search results

It doesn't matter what climatic passage that you are presented with in Scripture, you are always going to explain it away by your faulty opinion of Revelation 20. You view the whole of Scripture through the lens of your opinion of that one lone highly symbolic passage. That is horrible hermeneutics.

There are multiple posts, with multiple Scriptures, from different posters above that you have ducked around. These expose the error of Pretrib.

This is the one and only coming of the Lord. There are several references to this lone event. There are several recaps of the same event. That is the pattern of the apocalypse. Where do you think the rapture is in Revelation?

As you do, you totally missed the point.

You should be sorry because you are promoting an extra-biblical doctrine that was conceived by the Jesuits. The first person who formulated this eschatology was a Jesuit named Ribera in 1591AD. He interpreted the book of Revelation suggesting an end-time personal antichrist, a rebuilt Babylon...

You have to be kidding. You have absolutely zero evidence to support 2 future coming. You know that! Pretrib is an extra-biblical invention. There is only one future coming. Hello! Because you have zero proof-texts you have to cobble Scripture together like the JWs and Mormons to say what it...

More insults and bogus insinuating.

The evidence is in the text. It is compelling. Each parallel is climactic. You have no answer to the actual evidence. It is the end! Your avoidance goes with being a Premil. The last trumpet is the end of the world. It could not be more climactic. Whichever way you look at it, there is an...

Ahhh. Name calling now. That is always the Premil default when their beliefs have been exposed and they have no answer. Why not be honest and admit that you have no proof-text that teaches a rapture followed by a 7-years trib followed by a 3rd coming? If you had one then you would give it. You...

Exactly bro. All he has is what he has been taught. He has no Scripture to support his beliefs. Pretribbers do not have one single proof text.

Why would we need a rapture and a 7-years trib and a 3rd coming to facilitate the ingathering of Israel? That is another lie Pretrib teaches. This is all extra-biblical. You have no Scripture to support your claim of these 2 future comings. All we have is worthless human-reasoning. Where is this...

Jeremiah 30:3-7: “For, lo, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will bring again the captivity of my people Israel and Judah, saith the LORD: and I will cause them to return to the land that I gave to their fathers, and they shall possess it. And these are the words that the LORD spake...

You have been taught so wrong. This is all man's reasoning. Pretribbers rip Jacob's troubles from its historic old covenant setting in the book of Jeremiah, and its clear description of the Babylonian exile, and translate it to some imaginary seven-year period at the end, to support their...

Just admit you have nothing. Pretrib has to be taught. It is not in the Book. The reality is: this 2-future-comings theory was invented by Emmanuel Lacunza (or Manuel de Lacunza y Diaz), a Chilean theologian of Spanish descent (born in Santiago, Chile, July 19, 1731, and died at Imola, Italy...

This is all taught theology. No one one would ever go there of themselves. Many of us were deceived by this nonsense and are now enlightened. You are yet to show us one single proof-text. That is because you have nothing. Instead of admitting that you stubbornly throw out what you have been...

You are at liberty to swerve around these important issues. I feel if I was a Premil, I would also avoid. That is because there is nothing in the sacred text to support these claims.

You are definitely running out of arguments. That will never happen. Truth is too important to me.

Where does it say billions "as the sand of the sea" are "few"?

You don't like Amils calling out your extra-biblical speculations. That is thee issue. Because of this you get frustrated, and then antagonistic. It is not my heart to incite you; it is to establish the truth. I do believe a future millennium is an illusion. It will never happen. I do believe...

Not true. You have been taught wrong! 1 Thessalonians 4:14-5:4 confirms this saying: “if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him. For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the...