Search results

Over the centuries there has been a lot of interest in the event of the sons of God mating with the daughters of men and the offspring they produced. If you are interested in reviewing some of the theories on this story Wikipedia has some information on this….I say some but not all. Sons of God...

So many stupid questions. But it is no surprise considering your intelligence. You have a fantasy for a religion going on in your head, so again it is not a surprise. Yes the church should get out of crotch sniffing. Yes women are Christians too and should be equal members. And homosexually...

I have plenty of belief just do not make a fantasy out of the Word of God. Again the way you reason things you could come up with anything. The scriptures you have given do not say that sons of God were angels or that their offspring were giants or that they were bad. As a whole the sons of God...

This has really nothing to do with the story of the sons of God. And never said God's words are fantasy.....the fantasy is going on between your ears.

I do not know because the scriptures do not give us that information. Religion and history is not about making things up....that is called a fantasy. If you apply this type of reasoning to the rest of the scriptures there is no telling what you are going to come up with.

Again we do not have the information to answer all the questions that these verses bring up. We don't know where the giants came from, all we know is that there were more than one race of them and they were there before the sons of God mated with the daughters of men. We do not know that the...

Do you advocate priests having sex in the butt? Do they bring toilet paper with them or just clean up with Holy water? A stupid question deserves a stupid response. Women priests are not in the same category as same sex unions. What level of stupidity does that come from?

Nowhere....I mean nowhere does the Bible indicate that the sons of God are angels. Spiritual beings....yes. And no one is saying that there were not giants......there were three races of them. There were giants on the earth in those days.....and also afterwards. And also afterwards.....read...

Again this is the Catholic Church's problem, their rules only apply to those that are in their congregation. And I have no interest in the Eucharist I participate in the Bread and wine ritual as Christ showed how to do it. That is not true to the extreme, I have been in a lot of Catholic...

No one said they were on drugs. None were writing from Church buildings. No organization that would appear as central Christian authority. No one person was considered the central Christian authority. None called themselves Catholic. Early Church Fathers were independent Christian writers...

Again angels do not reproduce. The Bible does not designate the sons of God as angels. The giants were already there and there are at least there races of giants in the Old Testament....none of them are described as being the offspring of angels. The superior DNA....LOL....of the sons of God...

You should not talk that way about the Apostle Paul. LOL None of this says that the sons of God that impregnated daughters of men were angels.. I am a son of God....you are a son of God. The phrase sons of God appears through out the New Testament referring to Christians Again if the sons of...

Scripture please.....there will be a long line of scholars that will be interested in that scripture. Never said they were angels...that was my point. I nor the Bible describe the sons of God as angels.

I am speculating here with a little bit of humor, so do not take me too seriously. Angels do not have human sperm and do not marry.....true statement. But like I have said, there is not enough information here to come to a definitive conclusion. The Bible does not say that the sons of God were...

I guess I disagree with you on this too. But I did not say that the sons of God were angels. And I did not say the giants were the product of the sons of God and daughters of men mating. Anything on this is mostly speculation because there is not enough information and not enough following...

I cannot agree with this. I don't even think it was a stretch. But I will give you this, a fellow named Augustine of Hippo was thinking along these lines. But I disagree with him too.

Ya it is called reality lady. But I can see that reality is a game for you guys... For the rest of us reality is something that is connected to truth. Do you think there were astronauts in the biblical era? How about taxi drivers? The sad thing is that you do not care enough to look it up...

I would imagine that the truth would seem pretty shocking to you.

You have not produced anything that defined the Church as existing before 312 Ad and you can not produce anything that proves it existed before 312 AD because it did not exist before 312 AD. All you have is a delusion in your mind. Some bad men! You funny! Most of these atrocities were driven...

You can say they were like a Bishop but if you say they held the title of Bishop it is incorrect and depending on your intent can be an attempt to deceive. And if you believe it you are suffering from delusion. The word implies a lot more than what was going on in early Christianity....There was...