Search results

These issues of the Word are like facts on the head of a pin: They are expanded over time for revelation and understanding, not for literal/worldly translation. Knowing that God is above the world and His ways higher than the would-be timelines that would appear to be here-- we should be able...

You are looking at all of this in the way the world sees, and as He said, "The world sees me no more"...and therefore you do not see. And you are foolishly being smug about it to your own downfall-- Of course you don't see! Nonetheless, the other "we" do see Him...just as He also said. So...it...

You are taking God's explanation of events as literal from the world's perspective--but these things are about His ways which are higher, and not as perceived. As I have explained: In the world (as in Adam) each event comes as Paul explained, "each in his own order." Which is obvious for each...

Enough then. Since you have "obviously" repeatedly claimed not to see Christ since He has come into His glory in both heaven and earth, which is the definition of spiritual blindness--I leave you to it. As for me, it is my witness that just as the world viewed the cross not as victory but as...

Yes, although I have shown you your error and also explained the truth, you have made it quite clear that for you there is no other option than to accredit the stone temple with glory rather than Christ, the only true "holy place." It is enough. So be it. As for me, it is my witness that Jesus...

No...that is not the issue. The issue, is that you are mixing the terms of this world with the terms of the Kingdom and not rightly dividing them accordingly. They can only be joined by God, but divided by the sword of Christ until the end--neither you nor I can mix them. The temple made with...

Your equations are completely off--that is why I quoted you saying just the opposite of what is true even in the most basic sense. By your own demonstration, you are not qualified to comment in these matters.

Oh, that is quotable! You equate the world with reality, and the kingdom of God with fantasy. Yep. You do me good.

You're doing it again. Instead of connecting the dots, you are suggesting [No, claiming] that what is included ("in the which")...is not. Well. Good for you. You exonerate me.

America should be impeaching Biden for his involvement in Ukrainian corruption and illegally skimming millions of dollars. But notice how none of that is even in the news.

You are mixing what is only manifest, only made with hands, only flesh, only a likeness--with those things of God. But no, there can be no offence or abomination only in likeness. Those things are forgivable. But the abomination that makes desolation, is not forgivable. As I have already...

This is all good, but it would appear that you put the conclusion off to the future (as many do), when God does not put it off, but instead even refers to that time in which Christ shed His blood, as "now"--meaning then. Just as Jesus confirmed, "It is finished."

You have just quoted it but not seen it. It is all in one sentence. Here, I will highlight it in red (above).

No, but as I already explained: ...Again, your focus is wrongly placed on the things of this word--but "we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly...

No, no 'isms, just the complete word of God.

We have already had this conversation, and I know you would like to believe that no sin entered into Jesus, and you do, and it is even good that you do. But that would mean there is no abomination that makes desolation and that the word is not true. Yet these things cannot be said of the...

Yes, that is correct. But then you cannot say that Jesus did not take sin upon Himself, for which he died on the cross. Both are true, showing that He was both fully man and fully God and qualified in both to be counted as righteous, without which there is no salvation.

The problem with that is you are not counting correctly. Since He has come once in the flesh, and then [again] in the Spirit-- that makes His coming "again" already fulfilled in those to whom He has come into, as Paul said, "each in his own order", "first the natural, then the spiritual." It is...

This is correct. But that does not mean that you are correct in saying He does not now rule the world by His saints...just because it is not seen. Must you see to believe? God is not "seen" either--but He reigns. PS, You quote of your other post is messed up. I'll get back to answering it, but...

You are quoting, but where from, Ephesians 5:23?