Search results

No - Peter understood that his command for all to be Baptized "in the name of Jesus Christ" simply meant by His AUTHORITY. YOU'RE the one who doesn't get it - so YOU'D be the one following him around and trying to "correct" him . . .

No - ONLY when it's untrue. I've had MANY conversations here with people who don't like the Catholic Church for one reason or another, which is fine - as long as it is true.

Nope - there's NOTHING nicer than the words of Jesus Himself - and HE told the leaders of HIS Church: Matt 16:16-19 I will give YOU the keys to the kingdom of heaven. WHATEVER YOU BIND on earth shall be bound in heaven; and WHATEVER YOU LOOSE on earth shall be loosed in heaven." Matt. 18:15-18...

Complete hypocrisy and contradiction . . . FIRST, you say that I was trying to "debunk" Acts 2:28, which says to be Baptized "in the name of Jesus Christ." THEN, you say that "Nobody" was ever Baptized in the titles. What do you think "CHRIST" is, Einstein. It's a TITLE that means, "Anointed...

And your confusion can be encapsulated by your comment above in RED. There are several things wrong with this remark - not the LEAST of which is the fact that you simply don't understand just WHAT the Church actually IS. Allow me to educate you from Scripture . . . - The Church is the Body of...

You just proved my point. In Acts 8:36, they went down into the the water. You don't climb UP into a river or lake - you climb DOWN into a rover or a lake. I have never seen a river or lake that was UP over somebody'd head that they had to climb UP to. Not ONE verse about immersion . . . You...

Nope - not ME. The leaders of Christ's Church and their successors were given this guarantee. Jesus didn't give this guarantee to the crowds - but only to His inner circle.

And I didn't say that "Jesus" was a title. I said that "Christ was a title" - yet YOU baptize in the "name" of "Jesus Christ". Jesus Himself said to Baptize "in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit" (Matt. 28:19). ALL THREE of the Persons of the Trinity must be invoked...

WHHHHAAAT?? This is absolute anti-historical nonsense. Henry VIII and his daughter Elizabeth I murdered over 72,000 Catholics. His Catholic daughter Mary, executed under 200 - yet in England, SHE is known as "Bloody Mary". This is a classic example of skewed anti-Catholic history. As for your...

What is your problem?? I'm NOT the one bringing this stuff up. Why don't you tell this to your fellow Protestants who ARE. You attacking me for responding to this nonsense is a textbook case of anti-Catholicism. It's okay for them to attack the Church- but it's NOT okay for me to defend the...

YOU keep telling me His name is "Jesus Christ". Mary's Son is named "Jesus". "Christ" is a TITLE.

Stop pointing out falsehoods? Why?

Nope - only when somebody is actually wrong . . .

No kidding. And once again - that won't stop me from exposing you.

Okay - fair enough.

And once again - these were matters of STATE - not Rome. The actual numbers of deaths during the 400 years of the Inquisitions total about 4000, which is a FAR cry from the "millions" reported by anti-Catholics. It is also a FAR cry from the tens of thousands of Catholics murdered during the...

That is something you should be telling yourself - not me.

The sign of the cross and everything about the cross of Christ is foolishness to unbelievers (1 Cor. 1:23). YOU of ALL people should know that . . .

Not sure HOW many times you have to be taught this - but here are the words of Jesus Himself: Matt. 28:19 "Go, therefore, and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the holy Spirit . . ." Just DO what HE says. Faith is about surrender...

WRONG again, sparky. I never mentioned ANY name. My entire argument is about the linguistic truth of the idiom, "In the name of" - which I have MORE than amply proven . . .