Search results

What do you mean? Are you advocating annihilationism?

What are you talking about? Quite the opposite! What do you believe? Are you Amil? Are your Full Preterist?

LOL. The evidence is in the text. It is compelling. Each parallel is climactic. You have no answer to the actual evidence. It is the end! Your avoidance goes with being a Premil. The last trumpet is the end of the world. It could not be more climactic. Whichever way you look at it, there is an...

Lol. I presented the argument. You avoided it, as you do. The ball is in your court. Obviously you have nothing.

Not true. The subject of this thread is the intro of the NHNE. I should know: i started it. You diverted it.

That was not what i was talking about. Stop changing the subject. We were talking about the NHNE.

I did. You avoided them. You know it. That is your MO. I will repost the avoided evidence: The book of Revelation is not chronological. It is a series of repetitions. It is a number of recaps describing the spiritual battle going on during the intra-Advent period. How could Revelation be...

If you think the curse has been lifted then you are deluding yourself. Dream on!

Your fight is with God. This seems to be a pattern in your posts. The terms “the sheep,” “them on his right hand,” “ye blessed” and “the righteous” are seen to be synonymous in this parable. The wicked on the other hand are simply deemed “the goats,” “them on the left hand” or “ye cursed.” The...

Not so. He is coming in the future to glorify the earth and the redeemed and introduce the NHNE.

You are yet to find one single hole in the Op. You are ducking around the issues. Please present what is wrong biblically, not what cuts across what you have been taught or invented. After all, that is totally inadmissible.

You did not even read what I wrote, unless you are deliberately trying to twist what I am saying. I only read the 1st few lines and stopped. I rarely read your post. They are so contradictory. You do not even know that Amils hold that Jesus is in heaven during the ongoing fulfilment of...

You seem to know it all. Your vicious sweeping writing off of millions of sincere Christians reveals your heart. You seem to lack assurance of your salvation. That is at the core of your ignorance and bitterness. If people do not agree with you, you write them off. Arminianists do that. That is...

What you are saying is: Rev 20 does not say what you are saying. All you have is speculation. The reality is: the millennium is overrun by wicked followers of Satan in their billions (as the sand of the sea) who surround the saints of God at the end. This seems to relate more to our day, and...

If you make unsubstantiated or extra-biblical claims you can expect Amils to challenge that. That is what forums like this are for. It is only what the Book says that matters. The fact is, there is nowhere that teaches "that the rule of the glorified Christ and his saints from heaven prevent...

Your speculations are total fantasy. They will never happen. The fact is: all the wicked are going to be destroyed when Jesus comes. They will face their final and eternal punishment. The righteous are all going to be glorified when Jesus comes. They will populate the new earth. There is...

Ok. As I suspected, you have nothing of biblical worth. You make these sweeping claims but fail to provide the reader with hard evidence. That is the frustrating thing with debating with Premils - they don't have the biblical support to corroborate their far-fetched ideas. That is why Premil...

Ok. So, you have nothing in the NT, including Revelation 20, to support your claims. Where in the OT does it say "that the rule of the glorified Christ and his saints from heaven prevent the overt rebellion against God that we see in the present age"? Where in the OT does it say...

There you go again. More avoidance. This is your default response when your beliefs are exposed. Ignore the contradictions in your position as if they don't exist. You are living in denial. Your avoidance does not cause these to go away, but rather exposes them as marking your error. I refer you...

You cannot produce evidence because you do that have it. You are obviously not telling the truth.