Search results

LOL. Exactly. You have nothing. That is the basis of many of your claims. If you had it you would present it. A doctrine built upon silence is unbiblical.

You are ducking around the issue again. Where in Rev 20 teaches: during the a future millennium the righteous will reign in glorious new bodies while earth's mortal will continue for another thousand years? You are ducking around the issue again. Can you give us one Scripture that teaches...

Where in 2 Peter and Jude does it say that the earth "will remain with all sinning angels and men, in the blackness of darkness forever"? This sounds like another invention of yours. Who needs Scripture when you have such a liberal approach to truth?

Yes. It is total destruction. No one survives. I have shown you that and you have avoided that. You have to. There are no survivors to enter your imaginary future millennium.

Your pattern is to avoid the evidence. All you have is your ad hominem and your avoidance. That is what we have to deal with on these forums. Your avoidance supports the Amil thesis.

That is at the second coming (not some imaginary non-corroborated Premil future millennium). That is the end!

Where do you get that?

The earth will be perfected and inhabited by the glorified redeemed (including Abraham and Job).

Premils avoid the most important resurrection to let their opinion fit. There is one literal first resurrection where Christ defeated the grave. The Bible makes it clear that Christ is "the first resurrection" (Acts 26:23 and Revelation 20:6), "the firstborn from the dead" (Colossians 1:18)...

Exactly! That is what I am saying! That destroys your claims of Abraham retaking the ancient land in the future. The old covenant promises have been superseded with greater ones and better land - Jesus Christ and the new covenant arrangement.

More heresy. More blasphemy. More nonsense. More Unitarianism.

So, how can Abraham take these ancient borders "forever" as you insist?

Not to! You're adding on to Scripture again. You have to. Armageddon is not even mentioned in Revelation 19. You force it in there. The flesh of men both bond and free relates to all those who are against Christ - all the wicked, who spiritually take the beast's mark. One is either in God's...

You are talking about His glorified eternal perfect kingdom that arrives on the new earth when He comes. It is free of all the bondage of corruption.

Your arguments are essentially based on "by implication," not explicit Scripture. Your foundation is built upon silence. You do that with Scripture and the ECFs, who overwhelming taught Amil fundamentals. You force your beliefs upon those texts above when they do not teach or support your...

No you have not. You or no Premil has been able to answer that question. You didn't answer the question. Your opinion is not biblical evidence. Where does it teach that?

Can you give us one Scripture that teaches: during the a future millennium the righteous will reign in glorious new bodies while earth's mortal will continue for another thousand years?

Agreed.

Ok then. I will try again. Is Jesus 100% God and 100% man?

Yes you did. Stop lying. You deny His Godhood. You deny He is the Creator. You mocked : "I wonder why Satan didn't know that Jesus was the Lord God? I wonder why the Holy Spirit led Jesus to be tempted if God can't be tempted?" You are a blasphemer.