Search results

I said that because of your ongoing distain for scholarship. You obviously have no answer to the detailed Amil arguments. Your rebuttals are full of private interpretation and ad hominem. Look in the mirror! Your attacks are vicious and un-called for. Are you trying to mimic Randy K and...

Not true. You lecture others about what you are most guilty of. It is called projection. No one else presents such hatred and slander, apart from maybe Davy on this board. You are obviously a very bitter person. Please read your own words. Think about the gravity of them. Who else would...

You never take ownership of your wrongs. It is always someone else's fault (as per above). Until you show an ability to act like a Christian and stop attacking those you disagree with you, i will only highlight your hypocrisies when you are lecturing others.

It is always someone else's fault. Yea right! I highlighted your hate campaign above. It is vicious, extreme and relentless. It is a fact. The evidence is there for all to see. You would be long banned on any other board. You not only attack me, your attacks are towards all Amils. Your hatred...

The biggest slanderer on this board trying to criticize the behaviour of others. I do not think it! Here is a little part of your hate campaign against Amils:

Is it OK to worship man? Stop avoiding.

More avoidance. I am just exposing your nonsense, heresy and blasphemy. Your theory has just been exposed again. No apology or turning though because you are married to it. May God be merciful to you. you should not be allowed on a Christian forum.

Again, total avoidance. That is your MO. All i am seeing is private interpretation. There is one literal first resurrection where Christ defeated the grave. The Bible makes it clear that Christ is "the first resurrection" (Acts 26:23 and Revelation 20:6), "the firstborn from the dead"...

That is simply not the truth. It is the arrogance and viciousness of your words that are palatable. That is all you have. You cannot answer simple questions to support your error. You and Randy K are like twins in the way you insult. How about actually address the questions instead...

Not so. The evidence forbids your teaching. You are sidestepping the obvious. Those who refuse to bow the knee to Christ take the mark. Because of that they end up damned for all eternity. Simple! Those who embrace Christ receive the Father's mark of ownership.

I refer you back to the post you reference but which you ignored in every single point. It refutes your claims. There only is one future resurrection and judgment. You can try and invent what Scripture knows nothing about, but it means nothing. You have already been shown the biblical evidence...

We all believe that. But where is your 7 years after the rapture anywhere? The burden of proof is with you. You are promoting it.

What? But you said that is what we are? Is it OK to worship man? He is more than an image. He is God.

This is all references and no inspired words. This is a common Van-Imp tactic. That is because the inspired does not support your claims. Show me 1 rapture passage that shows humans surviving for 7 years? One, please.

Why not admit, what we can all see: you are way out of your depth on this subject? You cannot deal with simple Scriptures and you cannot address the simple arguments of those who rebut your faulty arguments. All you can do is avoid and insult. That is because Premil enjoys zero corroboration for...

Your failure to provide hard Scripture is obviously an admission that it is a man-made invention. So, you are admitting my assertion was right. What is different from the old covenant and your so-called new old covenant arrangement in your supposed future millennium? Why do you need further...

As usual, you fight is with the Word. Take it up with God. He wrote it!

More avoidance. That is your MO. "of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne [referring to Psalms 132:12]; he seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ."

The redeemed of all nations that come into the kingdom of God no longer “lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more." They have experienced true peace and have been reconciled unto a holy God. As a consequence, their weapons of war have been made redundant; they now...

You are all over the place. When your theology is exposed on one subject and one text, you just move on to another. When that is exposed, you move onto another text and subject. When did "the last days" begin? When do they finish? When is "the last day"?