Search results

Correct. It's a better argument for not worshipping YHWH as God on moral grounds. Therefore, the rebuttal must be made on moral, not metaphysical, grounds. Some falsely say a God who allows suffering is immoral. I say a man who denies the existence of God is immoral. Morally condemning God will...

John the Baptist was called a prophet by Christ himself. Prophets are defined by the fact that they reveal prophecy. You obviously have a problem with it, which explains why you keep splitting hairs. 9 What then did you go out to see? A prophet? Yes, I tell you, and more than a prophet. 10...

That reminds me of a funny correction. It's not slavery. It's democratic slavery. :spring:

Cultural Marxism is the primary means to achieve globalist ends. They do this by establishing an OPPRESSOR GROUP and an OPPRESSED GROUP. There is a sense of entitlement that the OPPRESSED GROUP are due to be in power because they have not had power. In different counties, these groups are...

Good questions for another thread.

That’s terrible! I’m so sorry. I’ll keep you and yours in my prayers.

Opposing racism is not the same as Cultural Marxists attempting to gain power by promoting racism, e.g., reverse racism, affirmative action, BLM, etc.

@St. SteVen, you need help! See a good therapist, I don’t know if anyone is going to report you for this perversion but I’m inclined to put you on ignore. Sad that you abuse the privilege of being part of an online community.

I used to work with a women who always wore low cut shirts and was bug busted. When I started she had just got divorced. Before I even met her, an older woman warned me of her ire. Over the years, I got to know her a bit. She did remarrry but never changed her revealing clothing. After another...

I made my point. 1st post. 1st sentnce. Then the question not answered. It is you who have no point with the "what's up with sex?" title. What specifically is on your mind; what is YOUR point for starting this thread? The OP is like a proto-thought, not quite fully developed.

Because you are not starting at the beginning. Your OP stated, "In the church we destroy sex with our religious views." Now, you are changing the subject from us (and our destructive ways) to God (and his purpose for inventing sex). That's moving the goal posts.

I asked a question, which you chose NOT to answer.

What?! I love my country but fear my government.

No. I quoted quora. Funny how you need proof for others claims while submitting a Strawman to support your own. Try educating yourself. https://medium.com/@sjfjsfjksflk/america-has-more-laws-and-regulations-than-any-country-in-the-world-we-also-have-more-policing-and-bb63e74fad0e

For a believer, you sure do seem to require proof for everyone else?

You are moving the goal posts as is your want. Ever read Song of Songs?

We don't speak Middle English anymore. To me, it's virtually unreadable.

Yes. 1 John 5:6-8 is an error and one of the most egregious errors of the KJV. This is why no modern translation renders the verses in the same way. Only a KJVO would claim it is not an error.

If I knew what ‘roided up’ means I might be able to answer. LOL

Another thread highlighting your weakness in the faith. God invented sex. Praise God. Sexual desire is not a sin. Lust is a sin. CS Lewis wrote how odd it would be for an auditorium to be filled as being watched a man eating a ham sandwich. Being hungry is not a sin. Excess is the hallmark of...