Search results

Please speak for yourself. But, no, you are again assuming vs. 24 means "future." It does not. This you apparently do because you do not recognize what the end of the flesh is or the death of the old man, as Paul explained. It is not necessarily the end of the world or death of the natural man...

I did not exaggerate, nor is it now right that you should exaggerate in questioning me. A person is right to do what is appointed to them by God, including walking through this world as a man, doing the things of men--it is He who has insisted upon it, thereby giving us life. Even Jesus ate...

The renewing of our mind...means to understand the things of time from the timelessness of our eternal God. These words (such as "ten days" in that passage) are simply God doing the opposite for us--speaking to us from our own perspective--because we are babes. But baby talk is not "all truth"...

Not that I would have listed all of those, or maybe listed some others...but Yes! Why are some of our would-be brothers and sisters in Christ helping to "sell" us something? It's crazy!

That does not say "future." You are only assuming it to mean future. But, no, I do not "believe" this has taken place in history, as Paul spoke against. But he also gives the correct answer, saying, "each in his own order: Christ the firstfruits, afterward those who are Christ’s at His coming."...

"Do not fear any of those things which you are about to suffer. Indeed, the devil is about to throw some of you into prison, that you may be tested, and you will have tribulation ten days. Be faithful until death, and I will give you the crown of life." Revelation 2:10 The passage reveals the...

Let's look at it: 1. In your statement above, where did you get "future" from? 2. Who in 2 Thessalonians 2:3 do you say is "the son of perdition?" 3. Who do you say are the sons of their "father the devil?" John 8:44

The marriage ordained by God existed as a practice, that we should understand the complete mystery of marriage only revealed after thousands of years, to Paul who explained that it portrayed the relationship intended since the begins, "as Christ is to the church." In other words, the practice of...

No, you are getting caught up in the unfolding of all who are in Christ-- which are "One" in Christ. Therefore, the passage refers to both the individuals involved as the sand on the sea shore, but ultimately to the One. The words are spirit. To the contrary: Satan is not a man.

That certainly is what is intended for heaven and the kingdom of God. But as for the church, we should be "equipping the saints", not kicking them out before they know the truth. The truth regarding homosexuals, is that unlike the role of marriage between a man and a women portraying Christ's...

I am not sure you heard what you just said...and yet it answers the question-- not as you purposed it, but without knowing. What you described is men of sin being exposed over generations, over time. That is it! That is the man of sin being revealed (which must come first)! Is only one man of...

@Michael S. Blanchard You might reword your poll above, no one can answer "Yes/no"... If Yes, the "no" keeps them from voting. If No, the "yes" keeps them from voting.

You are under the wrong impression. Jesus overcame the world. What you are seeing, is not Satan's continuing reign, but Christ coming to the gentiles [in the glory of the Father] which is in spirit. These are the times of the gentiles, and we are witnessing the manifestation of the demons and...

There are only two dates that "no one knows", and one has already occurred. By definition, we can know what the date is, just not when. As for what the passage refers to: It refers to God dividing the light from the darkness in the soul--the separating of flesh and spirit. Only one is taken.

"Blessed is he whose transgression is forgiven, Whose sin is covered. 2 Blessed is the man to whom the Lord does not impute iniquity, And in whose spirit there is no deceit." Psalm 32:1-2

Either way it's a gamble. But not with God. My life is already His to do whatever He wishes. I would rather go it alone with God, than experiment with those who trust in the would-be protections of men. God is good!

I didn't read all of that--it's too much. But you repeat, so l will also: It's not a vaccine. The pre-political data said that natural immunity was better than the effective rate of the gene therapy shot. The shot testing was substandard. ...and then things went crazy. I don't do crazy. I...

Persecutions. Bring it on.

These persecutions are yours. But I "do not fear them. For there is nothing covered that will not be revealed, and hidden that will not be known."

With all his name calling and slander unbecoming of a Christian, perhaps you should read it all for yourself. Please do.