Search results

Keep your arrogance to yourself. It stinks. Let's keep it simple, as you were clearly struggling to come up with anything: show me your rapture in the book of Revelation?

No. The opposite is the truth. You are so full of yourself. You have not been able to show us any mention of "a church age" in Revelation 2–3. You are unable to show us your Pretrib rapture, followed by your 7-year tribulation, followed by your 3rd coming, in the book of Revelation. That is...

You are so full of pride. Remember, that was what caused Satan to fall.

Believers have been murdered since the beginning. Check out the story of Abel. The first resurrection emptied Abraham's bosom and saw captivity being taken captive by the Lord. They now reign in heaven with Jesus Christ.

Where in Daniel 9:24 and Revelation 20 teaches "there will be no sin ... post the Second Coming"?

Why do you always want to take offence and play the victim? It is so hard to discuss with you. And please don't lecture anyone about judging. You are the most ruthless judger on this board. What i presented is taken from Christ's own mouth, so i reject your false interpretation. Once more...

It is! You know it!

Yes you do. Is the word parousia used for His next coming? Is the word parousia used for His coming after your 7-year trib?

Sorry. I takes Jesus interpretation and application of this before your bias mistaken Premil one. You are fighting with Jesus here.

If you have no answer just admit it. No need for your usual ad hominem when you are stuck. Show me your rapture, 7-year trib, and 3rd coming in Revelation?

Zechariah 12:10 relates to the First Advent: “And I will pour upon the house of David, and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the spirit of grace and of supplications: and they shall look upon me whom they have pierced, and they shall mourn for him, as one mourneth for his only son, and shall be...

No. Rev 20 is the last of 7 recaps. It takes us back to the fruit of the first resurrection 2000 years ago. Your interpretation of Rev has zero corroboration elsewhere in Scripture. Amil has countless support.

This is classic Dispensationalism. What is more: none of these teach or describe a future millennium in any way. You know it. Where does Luke 21.22 teach that "Israel still has to repent, after a long period of falling away, and that it will happen when Jesus comes again" ... "they ... will...

Boy oh boy. This is getting wearisome. You are obviously lost for Scripture. None of these passages mention a supposed future millennium. Nowhere! Neither of these passages describe any detail pertaining to Revelation 20. There is zero correlation. It is in your imagination. You force that into...

Instead of always presenting your personal opinions, how about furnishing us with hard Scripture that teaches that there will be a rapture of the Church, followed by seven-year tribulation, followed by a third coming of the Lord?

Not true! Where in Scripture does it teach: when Jesus comes “those who have not yet made up their minds" will enter into the new age, and have opportunity after Christ returns to accept the dictates of his Kingdom?

I disagree. You are just repeating what your teachers have taught you. You are totally ignorant as to the flow and meaning of Revelation. You cannot even support one claim from with inspired quotes. You can only quote what you have been taught. Ok, so you admit the word "Church" is not found in...

Yah-de-dah-de-dah. Your avoidance is obvious. You have clearly no scriptural text to reinforce your beliefs. You manipulate the text in Revelation in an attempt to support your error. You have no rapture in Rev 4:1. You know that. That is John getting caught up in the spirit 2000 years ago, not...

And? They are either saved or not saved! This is not proving your claims. Show me hard Scripture, instead of always voicing your opinions. Not to decide is to decide. These are also “wicked,” “ungodly,” “unjust” and “children of the devil.” Why are you ducking around hard Scripture? John the...

But "the time of the dead, that they should be judged" has not yet arrived until the second coming.