Search results

Where is this so-called "Jewish Hope" - "the Hope of Israel for a Messianic Kingdom" taught in the NT?

That does mention AD70. You force that into the text. Now, will you answer my question?

Who was waiting and saw Him?

No, you made the false assumption without ascertaining the facts, as you do.

He's not coming back to a corrupt earth plagued by sin and sinners, deception and being deceived, crying and dying, disease and decay, war and terror, Satan and his devils as you argue. He's not coming back to a corrupt earth that is increasingly overrun by wicked men in their billions. He's...

Do you still sin? Do you still struggle with illness and sickness? Are you going to physically die?

There are a lot of people that believe a lot of nonsense out there. It doesn't make it true. It is a figment of the imagination. Did Jesus Christ come literally with the coming of Titus in AD70? Did Jesus Christ come physically with the coming of Titus in AD70? Did Jesus Christ come visibly...

I didn't say that. I was intimating that the NT was the fuller revelation. Most enlightened Christians accept that.

No. Show us these supposed millennial passages. Let us examine them.

Let us establish a few absolutes: · Glorification has not yet happened! · We still live in corruptible bodies. · The earth is still fallen. · Sin and sickness, death and decay, are an ongoing reality for mankind. · The renewal of the creature and creation are still to...

That is simply not true. The curse has not been lifted from man and creation. That is still to happen. Man and the earth is still to be delivered from the bondage of corruption.

I do not do links or outside books. It shows a sign that someone is stumped. If you do not know what you leave or are unable to biblically justify your teaching you are better keeping it to yourself.

Simple! Because this is all your own opinions, or what you have been taught. It runs against the clear second coming passages. Jesus said in Luke 17:26-30, “as it was in the days of Noe, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man. They did eat, they drank, they married wives, they were...

Show us Scripture please. All i am getting is your opinions.

Then show me clear millennial passages that teach this. Premils foist so much unrelated OT Scripture upon Revelation 20, because they can make the less vivid OT passages say whatever they want. They have nothing in the NT.

No. Just highlighting a bad habit you have. You do not ascertain, you assume.

You interpret my writing as you do Scripture and history; you base much of your rationale on silence. Sad! Most people rightly engage on what is said, not what they think is said. That is why Amils struggle engaging with you.

Ok. You seem to be presenting what you have been taught. Not what Revelation 20 teaches. Where does Revelation 20 teach the Jesus will be on earth? Where does Revelation 20 teach that there will be no more war? Where does Revelation 20 teach a "very greatly improved time"? How can there be...

You are totally missing the thrust. There it is absolutely nothing here to do with a future age, but time in the here-and-now. This text simply indicates the briefness of time with God. 2 Peter 3:8 does not in any way indicate a future earthly millennium kingdom anywhere in this reading. In...

When did/does the old covenant end? When did/does the new covenant begin? When did/does "the last days" begin? When will "the last days" finish? When is "the last day" of "the last days"? What occurs on "the last day" of "the last days"? When is the "end of the age"? When is the day of...