Search results

Oh! Can I remind you that we are in 2022? So, the millennium must've started 22 years ago? Or are you like a lot of Premils whose theology was exposed in the year 2000 and have been forced to move the date of the second coming forward to suit their claims?

Premillennialists make statements like this but fail to carry it up with hard Scripture. For example, where does Revelation 20 show Jesus on earth?

How many resurrection days are there? How many judgment days are there?

No. Amils related the GWT judgment as the one-and-only judgement day at the second coming. Scripture never talks about Judgment Days (plural). Revelation 20:11-15 – 21:1: “I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away [Gr. pheugo]; and...

I think you are misinterpreting what he is saying. Amils believe in the final physical literal resurrection when Jesus comes. But they see it as the end. They see the rescue of the saints and the destruction of the wicked as occurring on the same climactic day.

I agree with your overall conclusion. I am a former Pretribber. Many of us are.

Can you show us one single rapture passage that teaches there will be a seven-year tribulation after it and then a 3rd coming (parousia)?

So, what exactly are "the side effects of being an Amil" that you "have concerns about"?

What are you talking about? Jesus testified after His resurrection: “All power [or authority] is given unto me in heaven and in earth” (Matthew 28:18). Jesus rules and reigns today over all creation. There is nothing that is not under His feet. What He says goes! This is biblical bedrock! This...

I think your post verifies what I was told years ago: inside every single Premillennialist is an Amillennialist trying to get out. You are trying to attribute Amil qualities to the Premil world to come that are alien to your theology. I will use some examples simply to illustrate. We all know...

So, who or what is antichrist and when does he appear?

You know that this is not true and yet you still state it. Most Premils teach that the cross was not the final sacrifice for sin, believing in numerous further sacrifices for sin in a future millennium. Premils reject that Jesus is currently reigning over His enemies. They claim that is still...

Not so. Where does it mention earthly Jerusalem in Revelation 20?

You cannot help your open-ended insults. It is who you are and what you do. The only side effect from Amil is deeply appreciating Christ more for His one final sacrifice for sin, His current glorious kingly authority over His enemies, the blessed hope we have of being finally and eternally...

I agree bro. But as mentioned by Marty above, there might be a strong argument to believe that we are in Satan's little season right now (however long that is).

What about Amil?

Firstly, He's not coming to reign for 1000 years. He has been reigning since His glorious ascension. When He comes, He will reign forever. Secondly, I also believe that He will come at an hour we think not of. This does not prove Pretrib.

Why would this support Pretrib?

Just curious, why would this support Pretrib and not other views?

Why do Premils always want to play the victim when they are the biggest perpetrators of this? Sad!