Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. W

    Romans 11:25-27. New prophecy about the future or old prophecy about an ongoing reality?

    It totally demolished your blasphemy and heresy. That is why you duck around it.
  2. W

    22 major reasons to abandon the Premil doctrine

    What do you mean "Jesus was the first to receive eternal life." Are you saying that he needed to be saved like you and me?
  3. W

    22 major reasons to abandon the Premil doctrine

    You are actually describing Premillennialism. It is you that has zero corroboration for your opinion of that much-debated single chapter in the most obscure setting in Scripture. You have nothing else in the Word of God. If you had, you would give it.
  4. W

    22 major reasons to abandon the Premil doctrine

    This is Premillennialism in a nutshell. It has absolutely nothing of biblical weight to support it.
  5. W

    22 major reasons to abandon the Premil doctrine

    It is clear that you have nothing to support your theology apart from what you've been taught. Where does Revelation 20 teach this nonsense about the introduction of blood sacrifices for sin in the future? P.S. Thanks for pointing out the typo.
  6. W

    Romans 11:25-27. New prophecy about the future or old prophecy about an ongoing reality?

    Yes. His character is the "mighty God." Hello! There is nothing you can do to explain that away.
  7. W

    Romans 11:25-27. New prophecy about the future or old prophecy about an ongoing reality?

    Stop avoiding: Did followers of Jesus in the New Testament worship Him? Was that right or wrong?
  8. W

    Romans 11:25-27. New prophecy about the future or old prophecy about an ongoing reality?

    Yes, the Son of God. God manifest in flesh, in whom dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead. As much as you hate to hear this great heavenly truth.
  9. W

    22 major reasons to abandon the Premil doctrine

    That is simply not true. That is only a small part of it. The main issue is, there's nowhere between Ezekiel 40 and 48 that teaches the sacrifices described relates to a future millennium. That is your own invention. You either believe the second coming is the end, as the New Testament...
  10. W

    22 major reasons to abandon the Premil doctrine

    Can you give us one single proof text in the whole of Scripture that teaches that there will be "sin offerings in the future" that will "be symbolic of the sacrifice Jesus made"? I am talking about "one." This looks to me like another Premil invention that enjoys no biblical support.
  11. W

    25 questions that prove that ancient Chiliasm was a different animal to modern Premil

    I totally disagree. When you are presenting an evidential argument, you have to support it with hard corroboration. That is something you severely lack. It is something Premils lack. This is a major issue that refutes Premil. So, I disagree with your attempted justification. Jesus famously...
  12. W

    This Makes More Sense To Me Now

    That is talking about our dead bodies. But, our spirits go into the presence of the Lord upon death. There is multiple Scripture to support that.
  13. W

    22 major reasons to abandon the Premil doctrine

    Is the cross not enough for you?
  14. W

    22 major reasons to abandon the Premil doctrine

    Many of us have moved from Pretrib Premil to Posttrib Premil to Posttrib Amil.
  15. W

    22 major reasons to abandon the Premil doctrine

    This is not a small subject. It is an attack upon Jesus Christ and His atoning work for us at Calvary. You're making a mockery of the new covenant. You are undermining Christ and what He has done for us.
  16. W

    25 questions that prove that ancient Chiliasm was a different animal to modern Premil

    My posts are always evolving and always being tweaked. They are fresh. I try to address what other posters present and not avoid anything. As a former Police officer, I am big into supporting evidence with evidence. That is a strong biblical principle. Opinions orientated posts prove nothing...