Search results

Porphyry is another heretic who promoted the Premillennial doctrine. He was an enemy of orthodox Christianity and held views that were in conflict with the more-moderate classic early Chiliasm. He was another Judaizer who tried to foist old covenant practices upon New Testament Christianity. He...

He is talking about a rich history and heritage of those who have had the Holy Ghost, had a diligent love for the Word of God, including many that lived close to the time of Christ. This heresy actually was birthed by the Premil heretics Cerinthus of Asia Minor (AD 50-100), Marcion of Sinope...

Excellent bro. Good points.

Your sinless sinners doctrine is ridiculous. It is anti-biblical and anti-truth and anti-commonsense. I don't know how you can seriously push it. To even imagine that a mortal (whether saved or not) has the capability not to sin runs contrary to numerous Scripture. Not that that is an obstacle...

#5376 refutes your claims. Not surprisingly, you avoided it. It forbids your theology.

You are clearly playing defence, and are on the ropes. If you had truth you would share it.

No. You promote blood sacrifices that Jesus did away with at the cross. Amils have showed you multiple Scripture that proves this. But you reject this. That is sad! Why not start them up in your church now if they are so advantageous to make you and your people holy?

Yes, it is an issue of integrity. Christian keep their word. Jesus said in Matthew 5:37: "let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay." You have proven that you do not keep your word. That is enough! Why would any Amil take anything you say serious now? I don't think so. I will keep reminding...

So, what does it mean "to celebrate the feast of booths" in "Jerusalem" in your supposed future millennium in Zechariah 14?

Christ is the new covenant temple. He is the final sacrifice for sin. The old covenant is abolished. I am not sure why you are promoting its restoration. For what purpose? Why would we need it? There was a reason why the curtain was ripped in two. There was a reason the temple was destroyed in...

What ridiculous and shameful logic. How about furnishing us with hard Scripture to support your Zionist speculations. Where do you get this nonsense in Revelation 20 or anywhere else in the New Testament? Nowhere! You are making it up as you go. Your teachers have forced you to defend heresy...

LOL. Gotcha!!! Thanks for this. This proves that you know that Ezekiel 40-48 totally contradicts everything you believe and teach. Thanks for the admission. We knew that all the time. We were just waiting for your confession. And, I, for one, will never take your word as Gospel again. You lied...

Why can you not as a Christian and as a pastor not answer a simple question that you promised to answer? How can we take your word serious after this? Is Ezekiel 40-48 historic or future in your millennium?

LOL. Do not even go there! That is not true! The opposite is the truth. You can't even give me one single Scripture to support your theory of Jesus resurrecting bloody animal sacrifices in the future to as memorial sacrifices. That's because it is an invention of your mind. It is not true.

The two verses that go before Acts 1:6 (relating to the disciples’ question) support the idea of a spiritual kingdom. The two verses that follow Acts 1:6 (relating to the disciples’ question) show the Lord giving a spiritual response to their question. Before the question came Christ was...

Yes, Amils do believe in deep study, something you do not seem to have the capacity to do. We make no apology for that. It is better than running with what you have been taught.

LOL. You can barely put 3 lines together in response to the many detailed Amil rebuttals and then you have the brass neck to tell me to "interpret Ezekiel 45, LINE BY LINE." No chance! You will never tell me what to do. You cannot even answer simple questions during discussion. You "interpret...

What you quote as evidence for your imaginary future kingdom is just a mere question from the disciples. That is it! For the record, the disciples said a lot and asked a lot that was fool-hearty that Jesus had to correct or rebuke. He did so here. But you totally reject His teaching. You defer...

Not fake, conditional. Let the Bible speak for itself.

Where does it state in Ezekiel that these sacrifices are future? Where does it mention in Ezekiel some future millennium? Where does it say in Ezekiel that these are "memorial"?