Search results

Where does it state in Ezekiel that these sacrifices are future? Where does it mention in Ezekiel some future millennium? Where does it say in Ezekiel that these are "memorial"?

Your fight is constantly with Scripture. You should write your own Bible. The KJV is obviously not up to your standard. 1Pe 1:19 But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot: 1Pe 1:20 Who verily was foreordained before the foundation of the world, but...

I didn't say that, so why should I have to justify it? You have ducked around so much Scripture you should be ashamed of your self.

You didn't answer my question. You said: I will try again: Is Ezekiel 40-48 historic or future in your millennium?

I just showed you it. Those who have eyes to see will see. Those who do not will not. There is no one as blind as one who cannot see!!!

You do not seem to grasp simple spiritual truths. This simply means that the Lamb was foreordained from the foundation of the world, just like our salvation. But, the Lamb of God was not slain until Calvary. This is 101 Christianity. Once again you avoid addressing every single argument and...

Wow! This sums up why every Christian should reject Premillennialism. Defending the doctrine is more important than biblical truth. Premillennialists are more interested in proving what it believes rather than letting the Bible speak for itself. Thanks for confirming what most of us already...

You have nothing in response to the truth. Why am i not surprised?

That is a silly question, and you know it. No Amil believes he was a false prophet. Why ask such an absurd question? Now, please address the question, and stop avoiding.

It must be a loooooooong shout that they all respond to.

Come into the NT and stop trying to take us back to old covenant arrangement. Dispies make the OT say whatever they want. They are exposed by the fuller revelation.

I can answer. Yes bro.

Exactly bro. We'll put.

Romans 6:10 says, “he died unto sin once.” Hebrews 7:27 says of Christ and His final atonement, “Who needeth not daily, as those high priests, to offer up sacrifice, first for his own sins, and then for the people's: for this he did once, when he offered up himself.” Hebrews 9:12 explains, “by...

The ceremonial law was simply a signpost to Christ. No more. The cross removed this imperfect system. The shadow and the temporal could only remain until the real and eternal arrived. Why would God restore animal sacrifices when He sent His Son to make one final all-sufficient sacrifice for sin...

Hebrews 10:18 says, “there is no more offering for sin.” You reject that. You say there will be countless more offerings for sin in some imaginary future millennium. You make the Holy Spirit out to be a liar. You fail to see: Calvary completely finished the Old Testament shadow and type. That...

Colossians 2:14 plainly and unambiguously declares, that Christ's atonement resulted in the “Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross.” The Greek word for “Blotting out” here is exaleiphō...

I know your position has been strongly refuted here, but, please answer the question: is Ezekiel 40-48 historic or future in your millennium? Answering a question with a question is normally admission that you have nothing.

You are so blinded by what you have been taught that you fail to see this simple truth. Sadly, you deny the Christ was the final or sufficient sacrifice for sin. Jesus is indeed the final sacrifice for sin. Hello! Do you get that? Or are you so married to the old covenant that you cannot let it...

Where did "Moses predicts that those [animal sacrifices] in the Millennial kingdom will obey the commandments of God"? Where did he even mention a future millennium. Your arguments and claims are getting more absurd by the moment. You add 2 + 2 and get 22, not 4. That is Premil in a nutshell...