Search results

Did you even read them? The vicarious death of Christ, and the shedding of His blood, saw the complete fulfilment of the old covenant arrangement and the instigation of new covenant. Nothing else! Calvary secured it all! Jesus cried out “It is finished” in John 19:30. This is taken from the...

When Christ made that final sacrifice for sin He satisfied all God’s holy demands for sin and uncleanness and thus Christ became the final substitution for the sinner. Ephesians 2:13-15 also says, “now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ. For he is...

It is true! How can that be so when you invent more legitimate and acceptable sin offerings restored in a supposed rebuilt temple in the future? You affirm that Jesus is NOT the final sacrifice for sin in your teaching. This is what Premil produces. Not so! You are twisting Scripture to...

Then present it here and defend it, if you are confident it can stand scrutiny.

You obviously refuse to come into the NT which shows that the old is gone forever. This is the danger of Premil. It produces so many erroneous resulting false teachings. This is another reason to reject Premil. When Jesus cried it is finished, the old covenant sacrifice system was finished...

Amils are actually split on whether this should be interpreted literally or spiritually. The literal interpretation normally relates this passage to AD 70 after the Gentiles destroyed Christ (in the form of the Roman soldiers); the Gospel then conquered them. Jerusalem is considered literal...

This is where Premils and Amils go in opposite directions. Amils believe that Jesus was the final sacrifice for sin. The New Testament Scripture makes abundantly clear that Christ was the final sacrifice for sin (Romans 6:10, Hebrews 7:27, 9:12, 28, 10:10, 12, 14 and 1 Peter 3:18) and that there...

The six thousand years of history theory is not in the Bible. It has come from your teachers.

Zechariah 14:2-3 says, “For I will gather all nations against Jerusalem to battle; and the city shall be taken, and the houses rifled, and the women ravished; and half of the city shall go forth into captivity, and the residue of the people shall not be cut off from the city. Then shall the LORD...

I repeat: this is totally damning and exposing at the one time to his theology. No Christian should ever say this.

Do you advocate the return of animal sacrifices as sin offerings in the future in your so-called future millennium? Do you hold to the restoration of the old covenant priesthood in your so-called future millennium.

That is because you do not have any hermeneutics. You wing it. You perform eisegesis.

Zechariah 14:1 declares, “Behold, the day of the LORD cometh, and thy spoil shall be divided in the midst of thee.” Isaiah 53:11-12 says, "He shall see of the travail of his soul, and shall be satisfied: by his knowledge shall my righteous servant justify many; for he shall bear their...

Zechariah 12:10 says, “And I will pour upon the house of David, and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the spirit of grace and of supplications: and they shall look upon me whom they have pierced, and they shall mourn for him, as one mourneth for his only son, and shall be in bitterness for him...

There are so many posts on this forum that have been ducked and dived around that have totally demolished your theology. Like most Premillennialist, when your position is exposed you run from the conversation. You have to. I refer you back to the multiple posts that have been avoided. I'm not...

I was talking about your theology, not you. Read it again.

So true! This is totally damning and exposing at the one time to his theology. No Christian should ever say this.

This proves nothing. He came with His saints at the First Advent and He will come with them at the Second Advent. I was talking about the same Premil tenets.

Like I said above: how about discussing the Op, instead of all these are distractions.

OK then, do it. Where is the contrast? Show the reader. Claims mean nothing. Please produce the evidence.