Search results

Good catch! From looking at it I would say both....because they are trying to translate the word clock

The Textus Receptus has nothing to do with the early church. It is another product of man....It has been known for years that the Textus Receptus is not a reliable source. Byzantine text! Byzantine! Textus Receptus circa 1516 AD--Erasmus. It was using corrupted Greek manuscripts and the...

No, you are wrong, I base my biblical beliefs on the manuscripts and the manuscripts alone. As far as the scriptures, the Apostles are the only "men" I trust. I could care less about what any other group of men thought. I compare the KJV to the manuscripts and there are a lot of errors....

You are right... And you can learn a lot by looking at the manuscripts. Some people think that interpreting the manuscripts is something like rocket science. It is not. Most scriptures written in the manuscripts are straight forward. The Apostles were not trying to confuse people. A few require...

None of this is based on facts. Protestants would not trust the Catholics for anything and the Catholic Church did not indorse the NIV or the NASB in anyway. The whole point of these translations was to look at the most accurate manuscript available. A simple comparison between the KJV and the...

I never said that. The Jewish Sabbath occurs every week....day of rest....remember.....every Saturday. The Passover occurs every year.....never on the same day....it follows the lunar cycle....the full moon. The Hebrew days of the week count off and do not follow the lunar cycle. So each year...

Women and Christianity....the longer version. Paul was singling women out in a very Jewish manner. Women should not preach, or have authority over men, the head of the woman is the man, and they should not talk in church. Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in...

Oh, no doubt.

Just FYI, the manuscripts did not come with titles, or chapter and verse numbers. Those were added around 1557.

Ego is mostly a male thing. And you are right, men have more issues with authority and obedience. Now spiritually, I would give women the edge.

Yes I can! God is real, the Bible is real, it occurs in history. And here we are talking about something that is historical. Finding things like the killing or innocence will be difficult....But this is not that hard to pin point. This event occurs on a High Sabbath....so Wednesday is not...

Paul was singling women out in a very Jewish manner. Women should not preach, or have authority over men, the head of the woman is the man, and they should not talk in church. Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with...

And you can't read....Touché!

The word woman is not there and a lot of scriptures are about men. Need the word woman in there. Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men. How many of these do you think there are.

One cancels the other out? So can you produce a scripture that specifically says women are saved any other way? Of course I will tell you that it is a very Jewish way of thinking. Childbearing in the Old Testament is how women were included in the covenant with God.... because they did not have...

Saved physically would be an idiotic position to take with this scripture. Childbearing in this era was a rather dangerous event. This scripture is mentioning moral conduct.

Do you know what the words alone and only mean?

Can you read? It says what it says....with no other deliberation.

I did not say that all people ignore the historical context.....but the words alone and only do have a meaning.

Like I said, God has taught us many things since the biblical era. Paul, said that women should not preach, or have authority over men, the head of the woman is the man, and they should not talk in church. He also said that, Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in...