Search results

For someone who supposedly went or taught in college your grammar is shocking. My 10 years old could spell better. It is frankly hard to believe your boastings. The fact is: the roots of your theology came from the heretics not the Bible. You advocate a non-corroborative doctrine. Amils have...

Amils rightly consider the intra-Advent period to be an indefinite period. This is last days period running through to the second coming. It is therefore proper to view Revelation 20 the same. The symbolic usage of numbers in Revelation reinforces that. The genre of Revelation and the symbolism...

Dream on! The opposite is the truth. You have no answer to the Scriptures. I have presented multiple scriptures to you that you duck around. That's because they forbid your man-made theology. I have tried to get you to address multiple contradictions in your theology but you respond with ad...

Why are Premils so venomous? Why not admit: your theology was invented by the heretics? I have presented the evidence. As usual, you avoided the facts. You then turn to ad hominem to support your argument. This is all Premils can do. History is damning on your doctrine. Why was there none of...

Where we not talking about the ECFs?

Spiritual Israelite totally demolished your thesis. Are you trying to rewrite history? This is fake news. Your MO is to avoid the issues because you have no biblical rebuttal. This is all Premils can do. They have nothing of biblical value to bring to the table.

Did they teach you to engage like this at your dispensatanism bible college?

There cannot be 2 first resurrections. That is absurd. That is classic Premil. It doesn't make sense. You have to let Scripture interpret Scripture. If you did, you would quickly abandon Premil. It has zero corroboration.

I honestly do not care whether you are the pope or not. Your boasting of your credentials is nothing else but pride, and is an admission you have lost the debate. Who cares! Dispensatanism is wrong. Your theology is grossly in error. The bottom line is, you have no answers to the truth. All you...

Premils have a lovely way with words. Ad hominem is all they have.

Not so. The only supporters you have for your teaching is the early heretics. Victorinus, was the first orthodox quasi Premillennialist who taught it 240 years after the cross. But he did not teach the rebuilding of temple and the restoration of blood sacrifice for sin. No others taught the...

Can you support this by actual quotes? Or is this the usual pre-millennial habit of winging it?

I refuted all your false Pretrib claims in 4 detailed posts. You have no viable answer to any of them. They forbid this teaching.

There is no 3rd temple mention in Scripture. That is a pretrib invention you have bought into. One cannot help but see the drastic move away from the physical to the spiritual, from the shadow to the substance, from the imperfect to the true, from the temporal to the eternal, from the earthly...

I was answering it in 3 parts. Can you not be patient?

Christ addressed both questions and both eras in chapter 24. However, because of the intermingling of His response, many Bible students suffer great confusion in identifying what aspect of the teaching relates to AD 70 and what relates to the second coming. Jesus addresses the greatest event...

What? Says who? According to who? You! I do not accept that. You do not even prove what you claim. You just say it as if it is fact. This is classic Premil eisegesis. Can I remind you, the temple is gone forever. Hello! It is destroyed. Get into a plane and fly to Jerusalem and you will the...

Whatever people are in view in whatever location (the Bible says Jerusalem and Judea not Johannesburg or Jaffa), they are limited if fleeing “on the sabbath day” (Saturday). This certainly isn't a restriction to American Christians, maybe Israeli ones. Now, why would such a matter be a...

I am not dogmatic on whether this earth will be regenerated by fire or whether it will be a brand spanking new earth. What I do believe fervently is that the new heavens and a new earth (in whatever form God chooses) will appear at the coming of Christ. It will involve (at very least) the...

I am disappointed in what you did here. I expect more from you. This is classic Premil eisegesis. You are wrongly gerrymandering Scripture together here to support your mistaken thesis. Daniel 9:27 says, “And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he...