Search results

Nonsense. It was simply defined at the 2nd Vatican Council. Show me an earlier comprehensive definition . . . Really? Show me where I made this statement. You lie so much, you can't even keep track . . .

Then REFUTE the evidence. Denial is not a valid refutation. It's a cowardly escape . . .

WRONG. I have produces at least THREE scholarly definitions of “Kecharitomene” from Greek scholars that AGREE with the Catholic position. Your denials don’t mean squat because you haven’t produces a SINGLE scholarly source that DISAGREES with that definition. You’ve only produced some...

No – I’ve answered this question SEVERAL times – and so have the other Catholics her. It's been explained to you that she was saved at conception. Now - please REFUTE mu Scriptural arguments in post #1838. If I don’t have a leg to stand on – then it should be EASY for you. Stop running...

Then why is it in every conversation we've had about salvation YOU and others have stated adamantly that ALL you have to do is "believe"?? Ummmmmmm, what happened to that position, hmmmmm??

Yup – that’s usually the case with adults. Ummmmmmm, where did he tell babies and small children to “repent”?? While you’re at it – where did He tell the severely mentally-retarded to “repent?? How about the unborn?? Chapter and Verse, please . . .

If you disagree with anything I said – then that’s pretty much par-for-the-course since Protestants usually make up their own sets of beliefs - even quasi-Protestant Christians like yourself. MOST Protestants that I have debated claim that babies can and DO sin. As for Mary’s sinlessness – it...

You guys are good a running and "LOLing" - but you stink at refuting your opponent's evidence . . .

And if you're going to make claim about Scripture - make SURE it's actually there . . .

Another "intelligent" response . . .

Again with your attention deficit problem . . . R*E*A*D my last post. Being born IN sin does not make you guilty of having COMMITTED sin. It simply means that David was born with the stain of Adam’s sin. This is the doctrine of Original sin – and has ZERO to do with personal sin. That being...

That verse doesn’t say infants have sinned – any more than Matt. 2:3 means that every single person in Jerusalem was aware of the birth of Christ and was “greatly troubled”. BOTH verses are using inclusive language – not literal language. Besides – as I already schooled you – Psalm 14:5 talks...

And YOU haven't shown one that says they CAN . . .

This is precisely WHY I said that you and your Catholic friends were ignorant of Catholic teaching. Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus (No Salvation Outside the Church) with its teaching about Invincible Ignorance doesn’t contradict previous Catholic teaching on the matter. It simply further defines...

Your question was, "Where is that in Scripture." I gave you a SCRIPTURAL response. If you disagree - then refute it, bu don't sit there and LIE and say I didn't respond.

Then, please point me to the post. What post number is it??

Yup – to the tune of tens of thousands of perpetually splintering Protestant sects that ALL teaching different doctrines bas on their different interpretations of Scripture – and ALL claiming they were “led” to this confusion by the Holy Spirit. What a mess you’ve all made . . .

The only reason you’re seed Sedevacantists “destroy” post Vatican II Catholics is because frankly, THEY were as ignorant of Catholic teaching as YOU are. They don’t understand the difference between doctrine and discipline – Tradition and tradition. Like I said before – the first red flag you...

I’ve already explained this to you on a few occasions, so your question is dishonest. I’ll explain it again for those reading . . . Paul is using inclusive language here in Rom. 3:10. It is similar to say, “Everybody in town came out to see the President’s motorcade”. It’s not talking about...

Wrong. The Eunuch had NO idea how to interpret Scripture before Philip told him. Sooooo, by the same type of “implication”, Mary’s status as “Kecharitomene” makes her sinless – correct?? By the same type of “implication”, Mary’s question to the Angel in Luke 1:34 makes her a perpetual virgin –...