Search results

I never recognized that. However, prophets speak for God, correct? No one says it is Moses's commandments on 2 tablets, even though he was the one to bring them to the people, right? Having said that, your references are not from the Book of Acts. So, I question why you would quote John in a...

Again, wrong. You are embracing the failed model of the Korean and Vietnam War where we fight up to a borderline. This is not how the USA fought the Confederacy! Again World War II is a successful model to follow. We fought them over there, which is better than fighting them over here. Israel...

More from the article: They’re neutral about whether it’s a good idea to rape and torture, and behead, burn alive and abduct women, men, children and infants. Can you imagine if any European country was neutral about raping minorities?

No. Welcome to reality. The price of liberty is eternal vigilance Thomas Jefferson said, not one and done.

Again, you are in denial. Context matters. Did their dispute take place after Oct 7? Was Candace talking to a Zionist Jew who is on record defending Israel's right to exist? Did the Allies have the burden of genocide propaganda as a means to get them to give up victory in WWII?

While I agree that we have to take care of our problems first, fighting for civilization against the Islamic Jihadi barbarians is our problem. While their coming for Israel now, they've come for us in the past and will certainly come for us in the future if we don't stop them. It's better to...

That is precisely what the Islamic Jihadi's in Hamas and around the world are counting on. https://www.christianityboard.com/threads/why-civilization-should-defend-zionism.59293/

See separate thread.

Hence, the conflict between the 2. President George W Bush famously said in response to 911 that "you are either for us or against us." And Oct 7 was 50x worse for Israel. What's this moral equivalence with choosing this time to criticize everyone broadly business?! :mad:

"The" article - AS IF there was only one?

Well, that's the talking point of Islamic Jihadi propagandists for decades. Not sure about who used it in the Ben-Candace dispute.

According to this article, https://www.newsmax.com/politics/gaza-samaria-palestinians/2023/11/20/id/1142944/, 75% of the ‘peaceful’ Palestinians support the Oct 7 attack on Israel. Safe to say until this number is close to zero, the war will continue - even if you propagandize it by calling it...

To emphasize the word's common usage of IDOLATRY as a god.

You are an exceptional athiest @Cerraco. Thank you for making my day. :)

It's an interesting point of semantics and hard for us modern people to imagine this information data storage was retained verbally for centuries. For instance, the first 5 books of the Bible are credited with "being written" by Moses. In point of fact, Moses lived ~1700 BC and the books in...

What would you completely rely on?

@Cerraco I thought you'd like this vid on the personification of science, er umm, politicization of "Science." LOL

My hypothesis is rewarding yourself and hobbies are outlets for the irrational side of us. I like to use fountain pens and recently added to my collection after getting through a particularly tough time. Our culture generally embraces this idea of rewarding yourself for one reason or another...

Scientific studies show people who believe in God are happier and life longer. This is reason enough to believe in God. With all due respect, you are confusing love with reward. Ever hear of tough love? God loves unconditionally and rewards as he alone deems fit. Grace is unearned favor. Not...

Again, you reveal how "Science" is your God. You suppose evidence showing archaic humans and caveman must mean that evolution is unidirectional, that devolving cannot take place? Take snakes for instance, are you aware that snakes have atrophied limbs as appendages and their evolutionary path...