Search results

How long is the “one hour” that the beast reigns with the “ten kings” in Revelation 17:12 is? i.e. is it sixty minutes?

The opposite is actually the truth. Amillennialists lets the rest of Scripture locate and interpret Rev 20. Premil lets Rev 20 locate and interpret the rest of Scripture. They do not force a bias preconceived notion upon the sacred text. Each passage, chapter and book should be approached...

I am starting to see a startling admission. You do not deny my thesis that modern-day Premillennialists teach the same doctrine as the heretical ancient Premillennialists and the Pharisees of Jesus day. In fact, you defend it. You defend the likeness between these. This is your justification...

You invent an age and force it into passage after passage. You depend upon your misreading of one highly symbolic passage located in the most obscure setting in Scripture. You interpret the rest of the Bible through your faulty opinion of that one chapter. Amils do the opposite. They interpret...

He didn't say he "reject[ed] the Jewish Scriptures" you are twisting what he said agin. Do you not have the ability to tell the truth? Just because your arguments are being exposed does not mean you have to always attack the messengers.

Oh. I agree. It is ongoing now.

The abyss is not a geographical place but a spiritual condition of restraint. Please remember demons are spirits. Satan and his minions were injured at the cross, Satan’s head is now bruised. His movement is impaired. He is incapacitated. Satan is a spiritual being. We are therefore looking in...

Both Premils and many Preterists must have three ages in their school of thought: “this age, the age to come and another age to come after the age to come.” Christ or none of the Apostles taught three ages (1) this age (2) millennial age, (3) age to come, but rather two. Premils are faced with...

No it does not. That is a Pharisaical invention. You make the same mistake they do. Christ did not teach a literal temporal territorial physical kingdom based in physical Jerusalem. He spiritualized it and showed it was a heavenly eternal kingdom that was coming. Jesus said in John 18:36, “My...

The reason why the Jewish Scribes and Pharisees rejected Him was that He didn’t meet their hyper-literalist expectation of an ethnic territorial domain. The kingdom He spoke of was spiritual and heavenly. This did not fit in with their carnal expectation. Sadly, Premils still seek after such a...

Under the old covenant, the kingdom of God is seen typologically. That is to say, the literal kings and the outward physical operation of the kingdom of Israel was just an imperfect type and shadow of the spiritual kingdom Christ would bring at the first Advent. God used this as a pointer to the...

You don't tell me what to do or not do.

I never said the thousand years is a figure of speech in Rev 20. It is a metaphoric reference, as the whole book is overwhelmingly.

Agreed!

LOL. Years of debating with Premils shows them to be the spiritualists.

Scripture exposes your opinion. Paul confirms the finality of the return of Jesus, in 1 Corinthians 15:22-24, stating, “as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive. But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ's at his coming [Gr...

Premils want to literalize that which is spiritual and spiritualize that which is literal. The kingdom of God that Christ introduced was of a spiritual nature. This absolutely confounded the Pharisees and their misguided earthly carnal concept of the Messianic kingdom. The Jewish expectation...

Here we go again! You make it up as you go! I will then ask you to prove it and you will avoid it. This is the frustrating circle that you constantly go in. Where do "the NT writers referre to the Age to Come as the 'Kingdom Age'?

Stop avoiding. Answer the question, if you have nothing to hide.

That is his MO.