Search results

@Ritajanice Is this good wording? Is this not condiscending? Is this helping in the conversation? Or is this a strawman attack because @Spyder is unable to repond to what is being said to him properly? before you start yelling at people. you need to start looking at everyone..

Wake up? I am done with you. I am sick of your childish behavior every time someone tries to help you. How do you take what I said to be bad wording. I just stated a fact. and gave a definition. If giving a defenition of a word is being childish or bad terminology, how are we supposed to...

Then continue in having absolutely no idea what the baptism of the spirit is. No sweat of my back But I am warning you now to stop with your Bull.. I am sick of your accusations..

Your not even close.. Nothing you said here is even close to what I believe

Will wait for you to prove me wro0ng Which covenant, the one in Daniel 9, or the one on the cross? the one on the cross was confirmed when he rose from the dead.. The one in daniel 9 has not even been made yet, let alone confirmed.

No it does not. It says one week. It has not ended yet, because it has not yet even begun, Thank you. You just proved my point John 3 again proves you in error God told us to hate our parent, Yet he tells us to love them God did not hate a baby, He loved the nation which came from Esau.

The temple has a holy place. and a most holy place. any rebuilt temple would have these two places inside that temple. The fact that it is not doing anything of value has no bearing on prophecy. Prophecy just states what is going on. not if it is required or not. Israel is in sin, They are...

This is not about the new covenant, Have you read daniel 9 : 1- 19? I can't believe you have, because you would not keep misunderstanding what and who the 70 weeks are about I am not worried about what it will do. I am worried about the fact God said it will be, and that it will be used, and...

That covenant is not the same covenant. But keep talking., You keep increasing my faith that I am right, and decrease any possibility of me coming to your view..

for 1 week The new covenenat is eternal Your not helping either. well yeah actually you are. Your helping confirm my belief is the only possible interpretation.

lol 1. He confirmed a covenant for 1 week. In the middle of the week, he caused sacrifice and burnt offering to cease. No you want me to believe in the cross he confirmed a covenant, and then at the same time 3.5 years later, his same death caused sacrifice and burnt offering to cease? Come...

Really That was not Jesus. Jesus never confirmed a covenant for 1 week. He fulfilled a covenant he was sent to confirm. An eternal covenant lol Jesus was sent to the world. so whoever in the world believes will be saved. Jesus fulfilled the abrahamic covenant - In You (literally your seed)...

Wrong 'Messiah was cut off. He is out of the picture as far as prophetic events in this period goes.

Christ did not confirm any covenant with anyone, He fulfilled the abrahamic covenant, and the mosaic covenant concerning the salvation to the whole world. and eternal covenant which could not be broken. Nor did he break his covenant half way through the 7 year period..

I think we should just read the passage in succession of events that will take place. The first person mentioned in Messiah the prince, who will appear at the end of the 69th week He is the same person that will get cut off after this event. the next event is the people who destroy the city...

I am just trying to correct a misunderstanding. and help you learn. If you can not handle being corrected. You need to look at yourself. especially considering you are a staff member, If you can not handle conversation and constructive criticism, well I hope you get the point

Please learn your terminology To baptize is to immerse or to place into. John the baptist baptized Jesus in water To Anoint is to pour on or into The Holy Spirit was poured on or into Christ at his baptism, hence he was anointed with the spirit. Once again, Jesus did not have need of being...

Just trying to help. Your wording was wrong.. did not want other people to think you did not think adultry was sin, but the way you worded it, anyone who did not know you would think that is what you were saying

Again, What sin was not in error? The only sin I saw them accuse of was the sin of adultry. The woman was guilty.. But she was not the only one guilty of sin in this issue, which jesus exposed.

Jesus was never baptized with the spirit. He would baptize with the spirit,, Jesus did not need remission of sin, He was baptized for the same moses washed arron in the river, To announce that he would be the high priest.