Search results

I’ve “learnt” plenty . . .

You’re ALL over the place on this subject because you know you’re wrong and you’ve been exposed. We aren’t talking about adultery or fornication. YOU brought up the idiotic claim that the Catholic Church “changed doctrine”. It is the position of the Catholic Church that it has never changed a...

I taught 2nd graders WHO was allowed to receive the Eucharist as they prepared to receive their First Communion. There is nothing “super liberal” about being truthful. YOU should try it sometime . . .

The loser of an argument never goes down easy – and your insistence in beating this dead horse just makes me have to exposeyour LIE that many more times. . . . Here is an statement from Gerhard Mueller, Pope Francis’ Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith: “If Amoris...

And bearing false witness is a "good example" of Christianity?? Perhaps YOU need to read your Bible. Tell me – does the book tell you how to deal with people who spew filthy lies with total impunity? Yeah - I didn’t think so. That's why we have Scripture . . .

Rubbish. A person who lies blatantly and with impunity needs to be publicly rebuked and corrected(1 Tim. 5:20). Scripture is CLEAR about this and it doesn’t differentiate between men and women. In fact, Scripture states that in Christ, “There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor...

WRONG - they're Paul's . . . Romans 7:13-25 Did that which is good, then, become death to me? By no means! Nevertheless, in order that sin might be recognized as sin, it used what is good to bring about my death, so that through the commandment sin might become utterly sinful. We know that the...

This ridiculous rant is a PERFECT example of your complete inability to understand context. Yes, I know that “Context” is pretty much a 4-letter word for you but it’s something that you need to be able to grasp if you’re going to try to study Scripture. The bottom line is that you'll never get...

And again, you are exhibiting an abject ignorance of Catholic teaching. Another example of the discipline of allowing or disallowing somebody to receive the Eucharist is with Protestants. Generally, Protestants are NOT allowed to receive the Eucharist because they are not in full communion with...

Yet, that's ALL you've been doing for the last several pagers . . .

This is nonsense. The Church has ALWAYS taught that doctrine develops. What it doesn't do is change - and the current Pope hasn't changed a single doctrine.

Deciding WHO gets to receive the Eucharist and WHO doesn't is a matter of discipline and NOT doctrine. How many times do you need to hear this before it sinks in?? I've had 2nd grade students who learned this faster . . .

A already HAVE - several times.

When you say “We” – do you have a mouse in your pocket? MOST people around here don’t agree with your bizarre man-made theology - so I’m not sure who “We” is, Einstein . . .

It would be a DISCIPLINARY matter - not a doctrinal one. Why is this so difficult for you to understand?

I have explained this to you, ad nauseam, and you don’t seem to be able to grasp it – but your ENTIRE argument about whether or not remarried people or ANYBODY else can receive communion is a matter of DISCIPLINE – not doctrine. Your insistence on my giving you an answer to your question is...

Like I’ve ALWAYS warned you – just TRY to stay honest in your posts and I won’t have to expose you all the time. Dishonesty is like a disease with you - and THAT is what is shameful . . .

The use of the word “If” is irrelevant, Einstein. He is STILL including himself. – a born again Christian, YOU claim that truly born again people don’t sin – and CANNOT sin. John, writing under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit BLOWS your argument right out of the water . . .

I already explained this to you. Paul’s confession in Romans 7 is not of a particular sin – but of his struggle with sin in general. He states over and over that he STILL SINS and understands that this is his condition because he is still in the flesh. YOU arrogantly believe that you are...

Ummmmm, and you accuse ME of name-calling Your hypocrisy is matched only buy your ignorance of Christ . . . Your angry rants simply show that you’ve run out of ammunition or evidence of any kind to bolster any portion you’re desperately trying to make on this thread. Wishing that somebody...