Search results

No, I think that relates to the fact that Jesus has all power in heaven and earth now. If you read Psalm 22 from the beginning you can see that it prophesies about the first coming of Christ. Maybe at the end it fast forwards to the future, but I tend to think it's all about the first coming of...

It's also worth pointing out that the Greek words translated as "first resurrection" in Revelation 20, which are "protos" (first) and "anastasis" (resurrection) are only used together in one other verse in scripture. Acts 26:23 That Christ should suffer, and that he should be the first that...

When someone believes what they want to believe, as most Premills do, there isn't much you can do to convince them to change their minds. You'd have to change their minds from believing what they want to being willing to believe what scripture teaches no matter whether it agrees with what they...

LOL! For the millionth time, you have misunderstood something I said because you're constantly making assumptions about what I'm saying and you can't make any effort to ask for clarification first to see if your assumptions are correct or not . I was NOT saying it's only because of that. I'm...

The silence is deafening.

Great points. Surely, the mortal saints of the imaginary future millennium would need another last trumpet to sound at which point they would be changed to have immortal bodies. They would need another "last day" after the last day when Christ returns. But, scripture is silent on that. Why...

LOL. Who is the "know-it-all" here? The one who has a doctrine all to himself and thinks that God reveals the truth only to him and can't clearly explain what he believes (you) or me? It would be you. You have blinded yourself.

It's truly unbelievable how some Premills on here try to make up their own definitions for words just to keep their doctrine afloat. I have seen it several times. They blatantly twist scripture to make it say what they want it to say.

By saying that Psalm 2:9, which Revelation 19:15 references, is not about the second advent but is about His resurrection and ascension instead. Hello? Wake up. Revelation 19:15 references Psalm 2:9, so if you think that verse is about the death, resurrection and ascension of Christ, then that...

He has that authority just as He has all authority in heaven and in earth (Matt 28:18), but you may have noticed that He hasn't destroyed all of His enemies yet. He will do that when He returns. I will never be in agreement with your false preterist beliefs.

I don't think even SDAs would say that, though they agree with you that the earth is desolate during the thousand years. Where do you get the phrase "the ages of the ages" from? LOL!!! You are hilarious. You know, the main-stream Christian church teaches that Jesus died and rose again from the...

You posted this: 20:4 they came to life ἔζησαν (ezēsan) Verb - Aorist Indicative Active - 3rd Person Plural Strong's Greek 2198: To live, be alive. A primary verb; to live. Strong's Greek 2198 is "zao". So, what do you mean you don't find it in that verse?

Again we see the lack of consistency in how Premills interpret scripture. The rest of scripture says Christ's resurrection is the first resurrection, but for Premils the first resurrection is somehow something different in Revelation 20. I even saw a post where a Premill tried to use 1...

He apparently thinks he is the ultimate Greek expert.

But the word zao does not refer to a resurrection. You showed yourself in your post that it means to live or be alive. That's why the KJV says "they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years" instead of "they came back to life and reigned with Christ a thousand years". But, you believe in...

Something is not making sense here. My source is Strong's as well. Click the link where it says "Strong's Greek 2198" there. You'll see that it says zaō. And you show that it means to live or be alive and not to be resurrected. So, where are you getting ἔζησαν (ezēsan) from exactly and what...

You must have a pretty low opinion of our English translations and/or the manuscripts they are based on. It seems like every time I discuss something with you, we end up disagreeing partly because we're reading very different text. Such as when we've discussed the meaning of Daniel 7:13-14. It's...

Yes, for sure. Why deny it? That's funny. That's why I do it. Because of your silly things that you say over and over again. Asking the same questions, raising the same objections, making the same "points"...on and on and on.....and on....and on..........and on.............. and on...

LOL. Say what now? We are talking about salvation here and you say it's not about faith? Joh 3:16 For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. You need faith to be saved and have eternal life, but it's not...

What is the point of warning true Christians about departing from God, as it does in Hebrews 3:12-14, if it's a certainty that they will return to Him, anyway. It makes that warning meaningless and something we can just scoff at. Paul says "See to it, brothers and sisters, that none of you has...