Search results

@TinMan cannot withstand moral scrutiny."Discrimination" has got a bad connotation but is wise to not jettison discernment. One has an obligation to discriminate in making wise choices, deeming other options as not the best. Tinman scoffs at such notions. If you were entertaining adding to your...

This meme seems to fit.

Outstanding points! I wonder what our friend, Tinman, will say to this wisdom.

I've heard that before too. What Scripture do they rely on to support this idea?

As it should be since the common denominator in religion and politics is morality. Aside from respecting other's rights, it would be odd if one had one set of morals privately but another set of morals publicly. For instance, being against child sex trafficing for public policy but wanting it...

Not an answer to my question. GIVEN, that homosexuals will not inherit God's kingdom, can you understand that loving Christian would want everyone inherent God’s kingdom?

Moral judgment just feels like hate.

The 14A limits States - not private business. Except for a few exceptions, private business can discriminate as much as they please.

PUL-EASE. That’s stretching legalism to the breaking point.

1st, being in a minority group does not bestow one with virtue. 2nd, sinners are the largest majority on Earth.

You keep falsely equating being Black with acting homosexually.

There is no such right to dictate to another. Most States are ‘at Will’ employment.

That almost sounds like an answer to my question; that you do realize that the Bible explicitly states that homosexuals will not inherent the kingdom of God. Now, can you understand that a loving Christian would want everyone inherent God’s kingdom?

Not sure where that long rant came from. This thread is about the Constitution in general and the 1A in particular. It seems you keep trying to make it about something else. There is no ‘separation of church and state’ in the US Constitution. This we agree on.

I can but I won't. 1st, I think you know what it means. 2nd, I don't speak a unique language. I speak English, were words and idioms are already defined. 3rd, your search engine works as well as mine to understand better this expression. :D Not sure why you are asking this. Consider What is the...

Yup Yup. Growing up in Massachusetts, it was that way. And there is a Supreme Court case that supports these Sunday Law Reforms. Shocking confession. The 1st Amendment states religion is NOT the business of governemnt. I don't know what these 1st and 2nd tables you are referring. However...

It is a constitutional thing. And again, you're using the language of the enemy. It is not merely worship but religion and religious practice in total that is the subject, which is much larger than merely the 1 hour worship service. Your question is equivalent to, "is freedom also a bad...

Great point and I agree. My point was never that the new covenant occurred in Ezekiel's time. Rather, that the heart replacement was to be done without strings attached. By "unconditional covenant" I mean in contrast to a quid pro quo contract. A covenant means both parties will do their part...

Then you are blind and deaf. Do you realize that the Bible explicitly states that homosexuals will not inherent the kingdom of God?

Your premise is flawed. You suppose you are correct unless evidence is presented to the contrary. But then you deny the mountain of evidence. Consider the OP