Search results

Quotable. For the record.

I answered that already. Why is it that accusers looking to do more accusing are blind to the very things they have asked about? Is it the lack of bold print? Would a 2"x4" help? ...'Cause it's a regular pattern.

That is not the question you asked. These are the questions you asked, and here are my answers: ...So, now, is it "confused" Mary then?

You asked a question, meaning you do not know the answer. I gave you the answer, but you reverted back to your own understanding and perspective of not knowing. Which is apparently where you want to stay. Enjoy!

I did what I promised. Post #713 in bold. Guess you weren't paying attention.

You should have signed "Slow Mary." I have answered this already as well: The Spirit decides. The context of scripture is not what men perceive it to be...that is the problem. No, the context of scripture is where and when God in spirit places it. And history attests to the fact that this is...

That is double-talk. That is just you talking. You are putting God in a box of your own private interpretation, of which there are none. And you do this against the scriptures that you have limited yourself to, considering them only in part and refusing to hear the whole truth as it is...

No. I filled in the rest of the truth, but it has fallen on deaf ears - so I have better things to do, for the harvest is great with many who hunger and thirst for every good word, not just part.

I call myself a Christian, a follower of Christ Jesus. But why do you assume anything, and why should I tell you anything since you are just looking for occasion to criticize? I fellowship even here, even with the likes of you.

Job 42:7

That is not biblical. God has not ceased from anything...He is the same yesterday, today, and forever. Your basic premise is wrong, flawed.

You have no idea. But still you accuse.

As I suspected: still holding to half-truths by only part of the scriptures, and accusing me of what you yourself are guilty of. See you in passing.

Okay...regarding you pitting scripture against scripture without reconciling them, and then projecting that on me after saying that is lunacy and a lie unless it agrees. Which, is also hypocrisy. So, you have defended the early church fathers and your fellows who have followed in their zeal...

I answered all of that. I will go back and highlight it for you, if you promise to go back and read it.

Oh, don't act with such a guilty conscience as though I was going to hold every name you have ever called against you... I was just referring to you calling me a "Protestant!"

God decides. But don't confuse pulling a foreshadowing verse out in the fullness of time for the very thing that it was first spoken, with being out of context. All but One is wrong, but why would you treat that One the same? In the same way, Israel killed the prophets that were sent to her.

It's not grinding an ax to come to the call and repeat what one has been given. Axes are not the only thing that cause sparks to fly.

It is you who are confused. But let's be perfectly clear, you have made error upon error and now you are calling names, none of which is very Christian behavior. But for those who care to know the truth and will be honest and decent, let's look at your errors: You are assuming that the evils of...

Okay... Although your post and accusations were based in your own beliefs and opinions, without all that - tell us: What is one specific thing that you find "un-biblical" in my Original Post? Let's see how you do without all the bias.