Search results

Welcome to the foums @QuantumBit. I'm interested in your avator and username. Very intringing. Could you explain it and your background? Yes, the verse teaches once someone dies, they will be judged. Other verses make it plain that the judgment has eternal consequences, which necessarily rules...

Projecting. My position is that you have no evidence to support your claims, whereas I have mountains of evidence. You cannot even answer questions about your beliefs. Predictably, you put yourself in the position to judge the question.

No wonder you cannot grasp God. You cannot even grasp that antonyms are not synonyms.

Yea, right! Your false Atheist beliefs are on record here. No denying it although you’ll try.

I am dealing with it; More word games. You believe in a god who is not a person, a magical stone that is not a rock, evidentiary requirements for me but not for thee.

Sure there is! Why do you not tell the truth? You’ve mentioned numerous times Jesus had a rock that magically caused his resurrection. For some reason, you play word games that calling it a stone, instead makes all the difference. So, it really is funny to see you deny, OTOH; and continue to...

Typical nihilism of Atheism. Living is not even a possibility in your world view. What a horrible ideology. No wonder so few rational people embrace Atheism!

Yes, I did wonder. The best explanation I got is not very satisfying. Something like the germanization of his native name stuck. Kind of like the QWERTY keyboard stuck even though it was designed to be inefficient for the mechanical typewriter days. Compare to DVORAK

Your idol again; just assert definitions to justify your ideology. Guess what? Antonyms are not synonyms. Living is not a form of dying. Your Strawman again. Numerous times I've asked what evidence proves that Jesus was an alchemist whose possession of a magic rock caused his resurrection...

So, your argument, your moral imperative is to NOT be kind?! God bless! What observation would have to be made before you question the validity of your argument?

Totally wrong. Living is a sustaining process! Dying is not. Your God complex extends to making definitions.

No. Living is not dying. The explicit proof they were not immortal was the 2nd tree, the Tree of Life.

Yes. It really is that simple. Here is a hint. If you assume the Bible is right - even though your own understanding does not grasp it - you’ll get a lot more out of life than hatefully trying to figure out how it could be wrong.

To be kind. You are gifted with the eyes to see our short comings. Show us by example how better to reflect God’s glory. What’s not to understand?

There you go again! Putting yourself in the position to judge your own Creator will not help you on Judgement Day. Why can’t you appreciate and honor the sovereign will of your Creator to be in awe of his unfolding story? The short answer to your question is that God has plans for us to live -...

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/projection

Incest was not a problem or prohibited until later in Genesis.

I wrote about God lying 2 years ago and got banned for it. The story of God lying to 400 prophets is even more compelling in 1 Kings 22:19-22. Regarding what God said in the garden about dying; I came across an analysis of the original language which conveys the idea of beginning to die on that...

You're projecting. It is YOU who forgot WE have to be all things to all people so some may be saved. All things include being carnal minded when talking to the carnel minded.

And how is that working our for you; how many atheists have you converted? Guess what? You don't have to be an obstrctionist to additional evangelical tactics.