Search results

"A chip off the old block" works.

Not the same at all: Matthew 19:8 "He said to them, “Moses, because of the hardness of your hearts, permitted you to divorce your wives, but from the beginning it was not so." A lot of things are not making sense to you. But my point was, that you cannot even see that even in the earthly life of...

Well, that's just wrong. Now you are dodging with semantics. I could also say that Jesus was not younger when He was older, or that David was not a king before he was king...but both were "the same" person before. So, what is your real agenda then - to stripe Jesus of His former glory, or that...

Apak and @gadar perets, Your unpacking the scriptures is not wrong, but only for a time. Then it is wrong...and my packing them up again is then correct, for this is the way of the End. So, your question of context is just a matter of when you mean, not just the context under which the...

I agree that they all fall into just three. But that is the thing about men's doctrines. But of the manifold of scripture there are many, but men only see what they see: The Bible Names Of God EL Table

Yes, I suppose I have failed to show you what you could not see. Not my job.

From the Spirit of God. "...flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but My Father who is in heaven."

Indeed. If we know Him, we know Him as Three (and more), and that they are not separate, but One. Not as a man and a woman are one, or as they have children, for we are lower than God. But as One, all in all, as higher and lifted up. For the difference we should look to the Spirit. For where a...

This is not about you, and I have tried not to make it personal. But you bring the question of your spirituality upon yourself, by only listing the quotation marks and not the word, showing just what it is that you recognize and what you do not. And here you've done it again.

I was not promoting the trinity doctrine, but referred to it as contributing to men's misunderstanding...as if three were all the attributes that could be named!

These are good questions. First, one must understand what a son is. In the creation story, i.e., the word of God: a son is a mere "image." Then, it is important to understand that the Son "laid down His life." Meaning, that His "image" died on the cross, but He had already laid down His life...

You lawyers... Must one use quotations for you to know when the word of God has been spoken to you? You make claims and act as a teacher of the word, but do not know it when you hear it?

One thing at a time... This He tells us was Him laying down His life that He may take it up again. But we know there is no life except in God. Paul explains what that quality of God was made visible in Christ, that men struggle with understanding and therefore resort to dividing what cannot be...

Such a position is not worshiping in spirit and in truth, but rather the result of wordsmithing without spiritual discernment. I have given you the scriptures...but you have not even discerned that much. But for those who have an ear to hear what the Spirit says, there is no dividing the light...

Philippians 2:5-11 5 Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus, 6 who, being in the form of God, did not consider it robbery to be equal with God, 7 but made Himself of no reputation, taking the form of a bond servant, and coming in the likeness of men. 8 And being found in...

Now you are splitting [God's] hairs. Again, you are separating God from Himself into two, when if He were in you, you would be calling Him One, as He is. Furthermore, sighting the truth of His lowering Himself (as in the giving of His only son) does not make Him less God, but merciful and...

This is all relative to the Trinity doctrine, which is true but misunderstood, and tends to create more mystery than is actually there, suggesting that God is not One but three. Nonetheless, attributes and offices do not make God any less One...and the further one goes in defining them as...

No...the only "clear distinction" is in your presenting of these passages, which shows your lack of understanding as to just what a son of God is, and for that matter, all that is in the world. "God with us" (Emanuel), does not indicate two separate Gods, but One. What God has joined together...

As I said, Jesus said He was "I am" - you [again] say He is not...meaning that you consider Him to be a liar.

Then you are not making any sense. You can't have it both ways. Either Jesus is "I am" (God), or He is not. Either you believe Him and what is written of Him, or you do not. You say He is your Lord. Is your Lord a liar? ...But here you say He is ("I am", meaning God) after saying He is not...