Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. Wrangler

    Reasons Jews Reject Jesus

    Wow! Blaming people for not believing is NOT an apology for why they should believe. Why bother posting if you are not going to respond - on point - to the 6 objections raised in the OP?
  2. Wrangler

    Where did they invent that I AM is some name of God?

    The Big Guy needs his 10%. Do you think "The Big Guy" is the Being's name?
  3. Wrangler

    Reasons Jews Reject Jesus

    I thought an excellent topic for Apologetics is how to counter the reason the Jews reject Jesus. Form SIX REASONS WHY JEWS DON'T BELIEVE IN JESUS: Reason #1 – The Messiah must be from the Tribe of Judah and a Descendant of King David AND King Solomon – Jesus did not qualify. Reason #2 –...
  4. Wrangler

    Where did they invent that I AM is some name of God?

    That's your answer to why you violate Scripture? Good grief.
  5. Wrangler

    Evidence To Be Seen - Part 2, In Scripture

    While folks like @Behold lean heavily on faith and against works, James does talk about the union of faith and works in 2:18. The virtue of works is the objective evidence of its existence. While God rested on the 7th Day, we are not deists. God continues to work, to show his faithfulness. My...
  6. Wrangler

    Don’t Make Excuses For Not Accepting JESUS CHRIST = Matthew 22;2-9, 14

    You cannot be serious. Our lord specifically says John 6:44-45 it is God who calls people to faith. Are you claiming God's glory for your own? Th preaching and hearing of hearing the Gospel is only us showing the door for our brothers. They still need to choose to walk through it. Praise God!
  7. Wrangler

    Where did they invent that I AM is some name of God?

    My guess is every English speaking person uses the statement I am. Not a claim of deity.
  8. Wrangler

    The Asbury ‘Surprising Work of God’

    Can you share the article?
  9. Wrangler

    Where did they invent that I AM is some name of God?

    That vague statement reflects your eisegesis. Mark 1:1 does not say that Jesus is not only the son of God. Why do you go beyond Scripture in violation of Mark 7:13? Why do you pretend it is a mystery in violation of 2 Cor 1:13?
  10. Wrangler

    Where did they invent that I AM is some name of God?

    Yes and notice. No where does that verse say this is his name. Why do you pretend it does?
  11. Wrangler

    Where did they invent that I AM is some name of God?

    His name is not I am. What you are identifying is eisegesis.
  12. Wrangler

    Where did they invent that I AM is some name of God?

    You certainly did get an idea because the verses you cited in no way affirm the claim that location dictates - or changes - the name of God.
  13. Wrangler

    Don’t Make Excuses For Not Accepting JESUS CHRIST = Matthew 22;2-9, 14

    To write this implies our salvation depends on ourselves. I just finished reading John MacArthur's Twelve Extraordinary Women, which quoted Jesus saying only those the Father calls accept him. John 6:44-45.
  14. Wrangler

    If atheists get accused of taking verses out of context, how do we know fundamentalists making those accusations aren’t doing the same as well?

    Appeal to Ignorance. Utter nonsense. We didn't get to the moon without knowing metaphysical truth. Truth is understood through epistemology. Our thoughts about the truth are independent of the truth. And Jesus is the truth and you may know him IF you humble yourself enough to ask.
  15. Wrangler

    If atheists get accused of taking verses out of context, how do we know fundamentalists making those accusations aren’t doing the same as well?

    Feelings aren't facts and don't determine reality. The future does not exist, in actuality, true enough. It's existence is a potential. You are so lost! Your frame of reference is in the man-made "sides" rather than the metaphysical truth. Your starting point of analysis is supposed to be with...
  16. Wrangler

    If atheists get accused of taking verses out of context, how do we know fundamentalists making those accusations aren’t doing the same as well?

    Oy vey! Are you confused. One side is what is true. It’s like you conceive of sides independent of the truth. What a riot.
  17. Wrangler

    If atheists get accused of taking verses out of context, how do we know fundamentalists making those accusations aren’t doing the same as well?

    Truth is more in the middle of what? According to you, in the middle of what does not exist. Of course truth is only on one side. Many like to play word games to pretend otherwise.
  18. Wrangler

    If atheists get accused of taking verses out of context, how do we know fundamentalists making those accusations aren’t doing the same as well?

    Paradoxes - like contradictions - do not exist in reality.
  19. Wrangler

    If atheists get accused of taking verses out of context, how do we know fundamentalists making those accusations aren’t doing the same as well?

    You know that you know nothing. This means you know something, Mr. Epistemology.
  20. Wrangler

    Former Democrat Tulsi Gabbard Calls for America's UNITY to prevent Nuclear War with Russia

    Truth is today's so-called environmentalists are watermelons - green on the outside, red to the core on the inside.
Top Bottom