Search results

It''s cooperation with God's grace - and it's MANDATORY (MARK 16:16, John 3:5). It's not simply an after thought . . .

1 Cor. 19:23-32 For I received from the Lord what I also handed on to you, that the Lord Jesus, on the night he was handed over, took bread, and, after he had given thanks, broke it and said, “This is my body that is for you. Do this in remembrance of me.” In the same way also the cup, after...

Sooooo, lemme get this straight . . . YOU are saying that Paul was warning the Corinthians that their UNWORTHY reception of communion was NOT because it was the Body and Blood of Christ – even though he explicitly says it is. YOU say that they were eating and drinking JUDGMENT ono themselves...

NONE of these verses supports the false, man-made invention of OSAS. EVERY one of them is contingent on our perseverance - one whether or not we REMAIN faithful. Jesus Himself said explicitly that we must be baptized in the TRINITARIAN formula - in the name of the Father and of the Son and of...

As long as you don't add the man-made fallacy of OSAS to that . . . Well, YOU are the one who was defending it . . .

It has ZERO validity, given the context of the conversation. Only through some pretty impressive Scriptural acrobatics can one come to the "amniotic fluid" conclusion. “Already” saved. Interesting – because the Bible ALSO says that Christians in the process of BEING saved (1 Cor. 1:8, 2 Cor...

And NOWHERE it eh text does He mention “Spiritual” Water. YOU are adding to Scripture what is NOT there. As I showed you before – just TWO chapters earlier, we see the Baptism of Jesus – with H2O and the Holy Spirit. Right AFTER His conversation with Nicodemus – we see Jesus and the Apostles...

The 7 Books that were deleted by Protestants are called the “Deuterocanonical Books – not “Apocrypha”. These Books were part of the OPEN Jewish Canon in the 1st century. Jesus and the NT writers ALL studied from these Books. This is evident by the almost 200 quotes, references and allusions...

WHO told you that the Deuterocanonical Books were NOT inspired??

That's NON-answer. Explain why Paul was using such harsh and cautionary language for something that is a mere symbol. "JUDGMENT" is a salvation matter.

Sounds pretty dern CATHOLIC to me . . . Protestants always claim that we do NOTHING for our salvation - but now YOU guys are moving the goal posts . . . It's about time . . . Uh huh – that’s the FIRST step. Even the DEMONS profess the THAT much (James 2:19). In Matt. 7:21, Jesus explicitly...

THANK YOU for allowing me to expose this idiotic notion that John 3:5 is about amniotic fluid and NOT Baptism. You must read the entire context of the conversation to understand what is being spoken of. John 3:3-5 Jesus replied, “Very truly I tell you, no one can see the kingdom of God unless...

Sooooooo, you're saying the water is amniotic fluid??

But the list doesn't INCLUDE us, Einstein . . .

And YOU are now inventing a new Protestant doctrine. Congratulations . . .

NEITHER of those verses makes your bogus claim that we are robots and do NOT have free will. Good grief . . .

That’s NOT the “LIST”. The list are the things that Paul says cannot separate us from God (in RED, Einstein).

HOGWASH. John was one of those Twelve – and it is John who uses the word “Trogon” – the way an animal rips apart his food as opposed to “Phagon”, which is the normal word for human eating. Also - in 1 Cor. 11:27-30, Paul speaks to the reality of the Eucharist and the severity of the...

Soooooo, you are NOW saying that you re NOT "covered" in the righteousness of Christ - but that YOU yourself produce righteousness??

No - we ourselves are NOT one the list, Einstein . .