Search results

I just thanketh the Almighty you doest not post it leadeth to death.

How To Rationalize Writing 14-Paragraph Posts 101: Like I discovered a new word, looks like you discovered a new phrase.

If confused by that. I thought Eschatology was a subset of Theology, like calculus is a subset of mathematics?

I say it is simply saying something bad about God’s intent.

Thanks but I didn't say anything about not seeking the Kingdom of God. I thought you were pivoting on it being external verses internal. Either way, we agree that it is accessible. :)

I beg to differ and believe @Dustykitten is correct. We have been given a divine heart transplant. Ez 36:26-27.

<sigh> There is no debate. There is only you dodging a simple YES or NO question. Yet, you keep posting things EXCEPT the answer. Yes. Anticipate my use of the word esoteric with all of your 10+ paragraph responses to things like a YES or NO question. And you dodged another YES or NO...

There’s your esoteric orientation, again. One time my 2 year old granddaughter took her empty bottle of her mouth and said, ‘more.’ I responded the same way you did. Without knowing what more is and why it is needed, I cannot answer my granddaughters unqualified statement, right?

I It only took 10 paragraphs to dodge the YES or NO question.

What part of, ‘talking about the trinity’ is against the forum rules’ do you not in derstand?

Not this BS again! The KJV is archaic and the least accurate translation available in English today. Job and Genesis shows Satan's little workers have worked much earlier than 1880. I won’t turn this into another KJV has had its day in the sun - but it is. Do you have anything to contribute...

Well, that sure is a lot of prepared text! It must have taken a lot of work to put it all together. Well done. And welcome to the CyB. From an evangelical perspective, the question becomes how to influence people to alter their theology to be logical? I’ve found the actual driver is not logical...

Socrates rightfully said 'The unexamined life is not worth living.' The same with examining 'the word of God' and not merely accept a verse out of context at face value. Paul had no problem with Priscilla teaching Apollos. That should tell you something. So, one has to reconcile the verses. Here...

No. If there were such a verse, it would be the most quoted verse. But that is besides the point of this thread and outside the scope of the forum. So, we'd all appreciate you following the rules and talk about something else, like the OP. I agree with your answer to the OP. Why do you suppose...

Projecting. It is highly suspicious that you do not simply answer the OP's yes or no question.

Who said that? (Jesus is not called the son of the father).

What verse says this, to worship anyone other than god, who we relate to as father? Odd that Jesus taught us, not to worship him but pray to our father, who is in heaven, while Jesus was on Earth. Most churches pray to god, our heavenly father, in Jesus' name. This is as Scripture says, not as...

Of course, that is a trinitarian invention, bearing no resemblance to the actual explicit words of Scripture.

Yup. 100%. I have no intention of falling into your esoteric world view. Too bad you have no intention of meeting people where they are, of being 'all things to all people' so some can be saved. Your posts are consistently to glorify - not Christ- but yourself and the pride you have in 50...

An observation made yesterday conveyed euphemistically ... CONTEXT: Teenage girl, who had a tough life, on the fence about turning to Christianity. She asks if someone accepts Jesus as their lord and savior, will they go to heaven and avoid hell? CHRIST WITNESS: Well, yes. I’m so glad you...