Search results

Soooo - you think that you're proving something by quoting an ANTI-Catholic source like "www.Romeschallenge.com"?? This makes as much sense as a Nazi trying to prove how useless Jews are by quoting their own propaganda. Unbelievably moronic . . .

That's just it - I've NEVER see you back ANY of your rants up with anything but your own angry opinions and out of context references. You may be a fundamentalist of some kind - but not a CHRISTIAN one. At least - I haven't seen any evidence of it . . .

This is absolutely FALSE - as usual. The disclaimer made is about the fact that there is no explicit transfer of the Sabbath in Scripture. This does NOT mean that it is not IMPLICITLY taught, Einstein. I already explained this to you. Show me the EXPLICIT teaching on the Trinity in Scripture...

You're playing games no because you've LOST your original argument. Neither Eve NOR Abraham ever claimed the things written about them in Scripture. Peter didn't claim the things written about HIM, either - but that doesn't mean that Eve wasn't the Mother of ALL the Living - or that Abraham...

As Catholics - we follow God. We simply recognize HIS Authority - and those He left with Authority here on earth. God usually uses tangible means to accomplish his ends - like earthly Authority. Abraham, Moses, David, Peter and the rest of the Apostles. Jesus did the same thing when He healed...

As I stated before - according to your Protestant statute of Granville Sharp's Rule - the grammatical and spiritual discernment of Matt. 16:18 can ONLY lead to Peter being the "Rock." For crying out loud - his name WAS "Simon". "Peter" means "ROCK".

And Peter knew he had Primacy over the others. That's NOT what we were debating. YOU argued that Peter never CLAIMED to have Primacy - and I countered with the fact that Eve never CLAIMED she was "Mother of ALL the living". NOR did Abraham CLAIM that he was "Father of a multitude of nations"...

Too bad it's not Jesus . . .

Please point me to post where this occurred - where I didn't destroy your argument.

And you have YET to debunk anything I've presented. All you have is your angry, ignorant opinions - and you KNOW what they say about opinions . . . A little advice: Get your FACTS straight before you post next time. This is getting embarrassing . . .

That's a pretty moronic claim coming from ANYBODY who actually R*E*A*D my previous post. My entire point was that he didn't HAVE to make this claim - just as Eve never made the claim that she was "Mother of ALL the Living". Neither did Abraham ever make the claim that he was "Father of a...

Your perversion of Matt. 16:18 violates another Protestant statute knows as the Granville Sharp's Rule, which states: `When the copulative KAI connects two nouns of the same case, if the article HO or any of its cases precedes the first of the said nouns or participles, and is not repeated...

The only "facade" is in the phony case you tried desperately to build around the idea that Eve claimed that she WAS the mother of ALL the living. You also dishonestly stated that Abraham claimed that he was Father of a multitude of nations. NEITHER of them ever claimed these things - and that...

It wouldn’t be the first time I’ve been called a “heretic” by an ignorant anti-Catholic . . . First of all – you cannot argue with Scripture. ALL of these verses destroy your position on the Sabbath: Acts 20:7 And upon the first day of the week, when the disciples came together to break bread...

YOUR problem is that you agree with Phoneyman when he tries desperately to paint this as a CATHOLICproblem. It is NOT. I have presented dozens of links to news stories that show this is a problem inPROTESTANT churches as well. As for the latest “scandal” – these incidents, as horrible as they...

Why should I scare you? People like Phoneyman who spew lies about the Church SHOULD be publicly rebuked (1 Tim. 5:20). Besides - I’m the LAST person you should be afraid of. Be more afraid of GOD’S punishments to those who engage in this sort of behavior than what some online poster like ME...

And there you go again with your dishonesty. Sure – you claim that you don’t hold Peter to any standard. HOWEVER, you originally stated that Eve and Abraham supposedly “claimed” those things that were written about them – even though there isn’t one SHRED of Scriptural evidence to support...

And this is all based on the simple fact that YOU are totally ignorant of Scripture. The Early Christians met on the LORD'S DAY - the FIRST day of the week - NOT the seventh day (Acts 20:7, 1 Cor. 16:2, Rev. 1:10). Jesus reaffirmed that the Sabbath was made for MAN - NOT man for the Sabbath...

WRONG again – but your dishonesty knows NO bounds, especially when you are losing an argument. Your original charge was that Peter never claimed to be the “Rock” – so therefore, he wasn’t the Rock. Eve never claimed to be the “Mother of ALL the living” – and you can’t produce a single verse...

That's because you're content to wallow in Phoneyman's ignorance. In other words - you agree because you ALSO have not done your homework . . .