Search results

Not really. That’s NOT the lesson of Original Sin. I suppose one can differentiate lived experience knowledge, from theoretical-theological doctrines handed down through generations. I know gravity because I have lived experience, even if I’m unfamiliar and do not know the text book equations...

Appeal to Victimhood. This seems to be the new claim to righteousness. I didn’t say to be quiet because of sexism but foolish talk. The point hinges on IS REALLY THE CASE (objective reality), not point of view. An authoritative reference either says X or it doesn’t.

I’m sure the best translation reads the word was a god, which is consistent with Jesus recognizing many lowercase-gods in John 10:34-35. John 10:34-35 Names of God Bible 34 Yeshua said to them, “Don’t your Scriptures say, ‘I said, “You are gods” ’? 35 The Scriptures cannot be discredited. So...

You are making a substitution to justify your dogma. Scripture does not say God became incarnate. It just doesn't. I know you want it to so badly but alas, it only says the word became flesh. Why do you deny this fulfills Deuteronomy 18:15-18, that Phillip was so excited to tell Nathanial about...

??? Just the other day in Devotional reading in Corinthians, it talked about the god of this world. Just because certain verses don't hit you like a ton of bricks does not mean they are not impactful for others. Praise God.

It is always true that 3 cannot be 1.

Right, the word, not God, became flesh. See the difference?

Again, 3 cannot be 1. Not because I say it because Jesus is NOT God according to Scripture but the son of the only God. Listen, Israel: Yahweh is our Elohim. Yahweh (not Jesus) is the only God. Deuteronomy 6:4 (NOG) (emphasis added)

How coy. Run Running Ran Are they really VERY different words denoting different things? Seems more like form variants are denoting THE VERY SAME THING in different tenses. I guess it goes to show mystical dualists will sacrifice anything intellectually to support their dogma.

Playing the fool eh? A trinitarian scholar who may admit that not all the trinitarian claims are valid. See the difference?

Relying on a bad translation shows how weak your argument is.

What verse says this?

No need to. NOTICE how this other disciple did not express a sentence, like Peter, you are the son of God? One does not offset the other. Peter's statement is a declarative statement of fact. Thomas expressed an exclamation - with no verb, no sentence equating to "you are God." When I drop my...

Appeal to Majority. I only met Christians who realize Jesus is the Son of God. Appeal to Subjectivism. It is not a matter of how to see something, with you seeing it from a different perspective. @Justbobg asked for a single verse that directly says he is God, like it directly says he is the...

You believe this despite the fact that no Scripture verse explicitly teaches that. Sad that you deny 1,000's of verses than identify god in the singular (including singular pronouns) for this anti-Scriptural belief you somehow got, especially with many verses explicitly identifying Jesus as the...

Yes, I was talking this over with a retired pastor and several friends. Heb 4:12, the word of God is alive. In 2020, the verse of the year for me was Ps 82:1 (CEV translation). I kept on thinking about that verse in how to apply it today. REAL lowercase-gods.

It can’t be three because YHWH said he is the only God.

Another mystical dualist who denies mutual exclusivity.

Prove it.

In another thread, posters asserted knowledge, not the Great Commision, was the purpose of Christianity.