Search results

Just pile contradiction on top of contradiction. It is your best bet to appear to make sense.

You misunderstood me. YHWH is the personal name of God. My point was no one knows the personal name of the Holy Spirit. Father and son are relational names. The personal name of the son of God is Jesus, not Son.

Again, artificial synthesis. You only take passages that appear to support your doctrine but passages that destroy it - like Jesus saying he has a God who is the only true God - is summarily ignored. See the difference?

Trinitarians cannot help but invoke artificial synthesis. It is the VERY reason you don't quote that single trinitarian verse. For instance. You want the reader to connect these dots artificially and out of context because it is the only way to make your doctrine have even the appearance of...

And the part you are blind to is that it also can be used to modify different antecedants.

Nothing you quoted is remotely is like The nature of God is a trinity - consisting of the Father, Son & Holy Spirit who are co-equal, co-substantial and co-eternal - and if you do not believe this, you cannot be saved but are damned to hell forever.

LOL Just where do you suppose non-trinitarians get indoctrinated?

That’s not true. God is perfectly capable of speaking on his own as the Bible repeatedly identifies. There is only one God - who we relate to as Father - according to Scripture.

What is UPC? Did you see my link on the history of it from a historian present at the Council of Nicea?

Would it?

Yes. Look it up. I too believe what is written. The difference is you impose trinitarian dogma onto unitarian text. I do not. While I agree that the text CAN BE taken to 'point' to the trinity, you DENY the text can be taken to point away from the trinity. I said it would be the START of a...

Build treasure in heaven.

Did our discussion ever start? Did you ever admit there is ANY valid Scriptural support to reject the trinity? Seems to me tha is the STARTING point of a conversation. In the beginning <tennis balls> already existed. <tennis balls> were with God, and the <tennis balls> were God --> That proves...

Hmmm. I think I understand the dilemma. Societal pressure. God's Will. Not the same. Society wants external and material evidence of busyness. Grass mowed. Housework done. Dinner made. Forest chopped down. Job obtained. Etc. God wants internal development. Building sandcastles in your mind...

Dear Heavenly Father, Thank you for this day, a day we can love you and each other. I lift up to you, my beloved brother, your beloved son Randy. LORD, you know he is hurting. Only you know the purpose. We pray Randy can reflect your glory and transcend this season of pain now. We love you...

The State pays for the education it wants, more precisely termed "indoctrination."

What do you want to do? What do you feel called to do? Maybe God is calling you to a season of rest now.

Except the Bible does not say this. The Bible explicitly says God - in his unitarian nature - is the Creator. Regarding relationship, the Bible further explicitly says only the Father is God. Supposing "Let us make man in our image" means there is a co-creator is one supposition, sure. But...

Strawman. The Bible ONLY has examples of adults being baptized. Was your lord baptized as an adult or an infant? I rest my case. False Alternative. I believe Scripture not other men and rely on my own capacity to reason rather than what others tell me.