Search results

You got that right. :p

It does for those who back slide.

So, what is your take on Ps 110:1 - in any translation you prefer?

Exactly. I no longer believe it is merely indoctrination and reading comprehension but point blank intellectual dishonesty - anything to rationalize the man-is-god thesis. Such passion for it, folks like PinSeeker fail to realize IF he is correct that 2 modify the one antecedent, a trinity does...

It depends. Winner AND still champion = one person. Mister AND Misses = 2 people. Point is, trinitarians claim their doctrine is implied. However, a true implication is a necessary consequence, not merely a possible interpretation. I cannot tell you how big of a deal this logical...

I don’t think pinseeker is a troll. He is a try believer in mystical dualism and has no interest in making sense, in being internally consistent.

Why? Because I don’t think you are capable of understanding it, especially when you realize it begins and ends with death and STILL want it explained. Suppose you belonged to a cult who believed they were immortal. Every time a member of this cult died, they justified/rationalized the cult...

Only for those who actually rest.

I’ve learned when trinitarians use this expression, it means not explicit but the trinitarian doctrine can be read into the text. If I say to my neighbor, we have one POTUS, one Governor, one major and one alderman-at-large, few would conclude all these are the same Being and saying so is...

Taken, if you cannot grasp that OSAS is based on Circular Reasoning, Bless Your Heart. You might want to study Post Hoc fallacy to assist.

Jesus saying all things are possible with God is figurative as you explained. Trinitarians are forced to resort this expression means jettisoning the constraints of logic.

My translations capitalize the common expression in both places, forcing an artificial connection. ‘I am’ is not what God said even though most trinitarian translators go with that. Something is lost from the original Hebrew. It means Eternal. God first expressed his unique nature to Moses...

Agreed, like claiming Jesus is God. :cool:

You should. The Bible records dozens of lords. None of them are God. To be a lord means to be the master over a specific realm. Lord Voldemort is master in Harry Potter. Lords of the Sith are master's in Star Wars. Lorn Cornwallis was master in England gentry. Once you accept that there are...

Except for when it aint. :oops: It's that mystical dualism again.

If you examine the actual Scripture, you will notice lowercase-lord is denoted. Master. Jesus was glorified by God to be everyone's master. Again, 1 COR 15:23-28 explicitly exclude God falling under Jesus' authority. The simple reason is that Jesus is not God and forever remains under God's...

I know you so desperately want to equate being a lord with being the all-powerful Creator of all. They are just not equal at all. There are 2 lords of the Sith. Doesn't make them God. Jesus and every other lord who was created was given authority by God. Doesn't make them God.

Scripture certainly Jesus was a created being for he is repeatedly called the son of God. By definition, son's are created beings. Trinitarians appeal to mystical dualism. Invoke a capitalization, Son, which they say means he is not a created being. If he were not a created being, a word other...

Trinitarians be like: So, you ADMIT Elohim is plural! This proves the trinity. <Mic drop>

Because truth is important. Abuse of capitalization does not automatically mean all capitalizations are titles. Why is it important that a common expression is a title?