Search results

As I've said for decades, if it weren't for double standards, the Left would have none at all.

Right. He called him lord. There are many lords in the Bible. Peter did not say that Jesus is God.

True! Most Leftists don’t realize that. Or why that is.

Again? This is my thread. It’s my question. If you don’t want to answer it and ask you own question, start your own thread thank you.

Well, 1st of all, you can’t answer my question with a question. 2nd, @Robert Gwin already gave answer, Mat 28:19,20.

Doesn’t mean every ‘word’ in Scripture references Jesus. In the case of John 1:1, it referenced the literal word of God, not the person Jesus.

What is hard to understand is any claim of a death meaning anything other than totally dead in every way. Death is the antonym of life. Yet, to say physical death implies a contradiction, non-death in some manner, shape or form - other than figurative.

We measure time from that point. This is the year 2022 from when Christ comes into the picture. Because it is common knowledge, I’m not sure what your question is.

I’m asking a specific question. Acts 18:5 New Revised Standard Version Updated Edition 5 When Silas and Timothy arrived from Macedonia, Paul was occupied with proclaiming the word, testifying to the Jews that the Messiah was Jesus. Is there a verse, not your opinion, but is there a verse...

Does their motive matter? The motive of communism is power over their fellow man. Sad that you quote the devils words. Fortunately, the facts go against this statement of faith. Mars atmosphere is almost all CO2 and is very cold. Whereas we have but a trace amount of gas. This disproves the...

Yes, Jesus is a man. He has set a day when he is going to judge the world with justice, and he will use a man he has appointed to do this. God has given proof to everyone that he will do this by bringing that man back to life.” Acts 17:31 I've come to believe in adoptionism. For Scripture is...

Not even close to being a trinity statement like I made.

No. The 'word was God' is figurative language, referring to God's words not his chosen suffering servant.

This is denial. The question is what evidence would qualify as Scriptural support AGAINST the trinity? What would that look like? What combination of words would qualify as rejection criteria? By contrast, my starting point is the precise opposite of yours. That there is no direct, and explicit...

Hmmm. It was a new poster not you who denied a falsifiable or rejection criteria. It was on my mind when I made the post as an example but I did not mean to derail the thread on OSAS. Without going into details, in another thread someone said X (evidence submitted to OPPOSE) the proposition is...

Well, I thought we were talking about OSAS and the ex post facto component of it, which is not falsifiable. If you want to apply it to the mystical dualism of the trinity, OK.

If you assert something it is either true or false. A valid assertion is falsifiable - in terms of the assertion being verifiable. There are degrees of verification, which delves into epistemology. This, coupled with moral imperative sets the stage for how important something is. For...

Once again, you are wrong. As MLK Jr said, "We have an obligation to obey moral law, and a moral obligation to not obey immoral law." The Bible is filled with rebellion against established government, starting with God commanding the conquest of Caanan. Just like the Sabbath, we do not exist...

Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom. 2 Corinthians 3:17

Certainly not! Do you see human waste thrown out windows in major cities on a regular basis? How about pandemics of disease due to human and animal infested water? When was the last time you saw horse feces covering every road you travel? And the idea that CO2 is a pollutant is absurd and...