Search results

And I'm posting a reply from Scripture. I am allowed to represent Scripture here - just as much as she is allowed to misrepresent it.

Translation: "I don't have any "evidence". Just another situation where I stuck my foot in my mouth."

I'm not trying to prove that I'M right about anything. The Scriptures are right. I'm just relaying that to you. If that sounds "demonic" to you - take it up with God - not me.

Sure - but she rejects the replies she gets. Remember - this is an opinions board for ALL posters - not just her.

And what evidence is that? All you have are aberrant beliefs that don't have a whole lot to do with Christianity . . .

Then WHY did you tell me that we don't need teachers when the Word of God says we DO? Why bother posting that?

And it's ALSO physical . . . Matt. 5:13-16 “You are the salt of the EARTH. But if the salt loses its saltiness, how can it be made salty again? It is no longer good for anything, except to be thrown out and trampled underfoot. “You are the light of the WORLD. A town built on a hill cannot be...

That's all fine and dandy - but don't deny what the Scriptures are saying. There are indeed teachers - and to reject this is to reject the Word of God.

Amen.

The only "simplicity" in this post is your simplistic understanding of the Scriptures. 1 John 2:27 speaks of not having to be taught of our anointing by the Holy Spirit. In other words, nobody can experience that FOR you. Jesus commanded the leaders of His Church to TEACH: Matt. 28:18-20...

Still refusing to understand that the Church is physical as well as spiritual, I see. Tell me, if you slice your finger - do you bleed - or does the knife just magically pass through? Christ's Church is comprised of PEOPLE - not just spirits. People have TWO natures.

I would like to qualify that assessment. It's not Catholic vs. Protestant. It's anti-Catholic lies vs. Catholics. Not all Protestants are anti-Catholics. There are some on this forum who realize that ALL Christians have a kinship in Christ - albeit separated.

And if you had bothered to actually read my posts - I already said that it is not up to us to condemn a person's soul. That's God's call. However, Baptism IS required (Mark 16:16, John 3:5) - and one cannot hope to have eternal life if he rejects Christ (Luke 10:16). We're NOT talking about...

Yes, they accept Him only as a prophet - but reject His role as Savior.

Wrong. You can judge if a person is wrong. What we cannot do is condemn their souls - which neither I nor the Church has EVER done. Those who claim that Scripture tells us NOT to judge a person's fruits simply doesn't know the Word of God (John 7:24, Matt 7:15-20).

It's not about "mouthing words". It's about accepting or rejecting Christ. Islam rejects Jesus as the Savior of the world.

Your potty-mouth notwithstanding - if it's Scriptural evidence about Peter's leadership you want - here you go . . . As you know, the Lord said to Peter, “And so I say to you, you are Peter (Petros), and upon this rock (Petra) I will build my church, and the gates of the netherworld shall not...

Soooo, Jesus lied to the Apostles when He commissioned them to TEACH all nations?? Explain.

Then again - explain the tens of thousands of perpetually-splintering Protestant sects - teaching different doctrines that are as different as night and day - and each claiming to have been led by the Holy Spirit. What a mess . . .

No - you claimed that Jesus was speaking of Israel in Matt. 5:14-16 - when He was teaching ALL of us. As I said - by that twisted logic - we don't need the Gospel because it's not directed at us anyway. What ignorance. 2 Pet. 3:16 His letters contain some things that are hard to understand...