Search results

If your "church" is wrong about ANY doctrinal matter - then you're not part of Christ's Church because His is never wrong about teaching on faith and morals.

I chose to believe in what Jesus told Peter. YOU chose to reject what He said to him i, favor of what your Protestant Fathers decided. God will not be mocked - nor will he be disobeyed. I don't blame God for your rejection of His Word. On the contrary - YOU chose to follow what prideful...

Yes, you certainly do. You allow for the truth to expose the deceit.

And this still smacks of an ignorance of the faith. You simply didn't know what the Church actually taught - or you would never have left.

If you were able to construct a cohesive sentence - I might respond to it. But, as it is, you aren't making any - as usual . . .

And the mark of an ungodly person is one who lies about others because it violates those commandments.. I never said that you or anybody else was "hell bound." I never even implied it. If you guys can put your heads together and TRY to be honest for a change - we might have a fruitful...

You may have "been" Catholic - but I doubt you were very faithful. Unfortunately, you were an ignorant Catholic who was seduced away from the truth in favor of a partial truth.

We didn't make the choice to build the Church on Peter - Jesus did. YOUR problem is with Him - not me . . . No - the plain fact of the matter is that YOU and most of Protestantism rejected what the Holy Spirit revealed in favor of what mere men decided. You guys chose to delete those 7 Books...

And arguihng with YOU is pointless because you refuse to see truth. In comparison with other suns - our sun is still hot, but may not be as hot as others. This is just another one of your cop-outs . . .

Thank you for that cop-out of an answer - but, I understand what a shock it might be for some to know that the Holy Spirit guided the Catholic Church to declare the Canon of Scripture. As for the OT Canon - surely you know that the Protestant OT Canon excludes the 7 Deuterocanonical Books that...

And unless you've become the mouthpiece for Amadeus - I was responding to his question: "And is not the statement that your your beliefs are objective truth while mine are wrong also a mere opinion?" I didn't say that the sun generated truth. Therefore - the response I gave about the sun was...

How about adding something to the conversation instead of just moronic commentary?

Wrong. See my last post (#2334) . . .

Nope. That's like asking whether or not the sun is hot simply because I say so. It's hot - and that's just a fact. The fact that I agree that it's hot has nothing to do with it.

Absolutely - under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, as Jesus promised: John 16:12-15 “I have much more to tell you, but you cannot bear it now. But when he comes, the Spirit of truth, he will guide you to ALL truth. He will not speak on his own, but he will speak what he hears, and will declare...

Yes, the irony indeed . . .

No - all you did was imply that the evidence that Kepha31 presented was "foolishness" by taking a verse of Scripture out of context. It was a non-answer because you had no response for the overwhelming Protestant scholarship against you.

Ummmm, you STILL haven't told me what you are "forgiving" me for. You were trying to be funny and I exposed you. Checkmate.

And, as I've been telling your friend Amadeus, Truth is not an opinion. The truth that the Church teaches is true - regardless of your rejection of it . . .

Nope - I want to yto tell me for the first time. You've been dodging this question for several posts now.