Search results

LOL. You value tradition over the word of God. So far, your entire basis is to rely on a verse that does not even mention Jesus but put everything on he word rather than this word, like John 6:60. Guess what? Even if true, 2 do not a trinity make. So fierce is the devotion to the man-is-god...

This is because you are demanding the Word of God be more than it is. In some places, the Bible is very practical. "You shall not steal" is just one practical principle upon which to base human interaction. Of course, people for centuries have read into such plain words spiritulization. While...

Absolutely not. To this day, it means being on the same page, not being the same being.

Nonsense. Billions living at a higher standard of living when there were only 1 million. IF the premise that more destroyed the world, the evidence would be people getting poorer, lower standard of living. STOP BELIEVING THE LEFTIST PROPAGANDA! How many people do you know who are born in a barn...

I accept the Bible.

I am a unitarian Christian, not affiliated with the church by that name, Unitarian-Universalism, who have been taken over by Pagans.

No. I'm only pointing out the absurdity of trinitarianism through Scripture. "For us, there is only one God, the Father." Some magical way, trinitarians take this explicit statement of unitarianism to mean anything else. (There is not verse, for us, there is a 3 in one God made up of ...)

Totally untrue on both counts. "The trinity is Biblical" goes against the fact that the trinity is not actually in the Bible. The Bible's themes are explicit in every Epistle's prologue; Father (who is Sprit and whose Spirit is Holy) and his (adopted) Son.

Truth is that IS EXACTLY the trinitarian interpretation I'm talking about in John 6:60, the very same Greek word is properly translated as "this."

It's not about re-writing but ejecting trinitarianism interpretation onto unitarian text - which the whole Bible is. Funny thing, the Gospel of John is the most anti-trinitarian book of the entire New Testament.

You know I've answered this many, many times ... Not WHO, but WHAT. Words are WHAT's not WHO's. God's words are an attribute of his being, not another being.

Is that what it takes for you to concede your false doctrine, an expert in Hebrew and Greek?

But the word was not Jesus! No where in John 1:1 is Jesus even mentioned.

Saying it over and over again does not make is true. Where is your Scriptural evidence? You are comparing a State official AS EQUAL to a member of body of Christ?

Exactly. The bickering over doctrine would be funny if people weren't so hateful over it.

Wow! Vengeance is theefaith's says the Lord?! Sometimes I read your posts and think you must be an alien.

Undoubtedly, you will invent a new meaning for explicit, like 'For us, there is one God, the Father.' There is no such scripture verse anything like The nature of God is a trinity - consisting of the F, S & HS, who are co-substantial, co-eternal and co-equal - and if you don't believe this you...

I could have sworn Jesus, on Earth, telling us to pray to our Father, who is in heaven.

Worse, driven my some kind of personal animus. I understand there are 30K Christian denominations. I don’t attack those denominations who adhere to doctrines I don’t share. Why did this thread get twisted into bashing one denomination?