Search results

I see. Even though the text says Jesus is a man that God selected, he is not. Funny thing, all begotten men can be chosen by their father for a purpose - or not. In other words, just because Jesus is God's begotten, does not change the Q&A at all. (No one is denying that Jesus is God's begotten...

Except the trinity.

Acts was written by Luke, not Paul.

You most certainly have stretch the truth with your proclamation NOT found in the text in question. It’s fine to talk about OTHER attributes of Jesus in other threads. Whose son he is does not fall under the atttrubute under discussion. The singular question in this thread is, based on the...

Predictable. Hence, the OP scope of discussion.

Sure but my question was not WHEN but HOW such a conclusion reached in light of such verses as the OP?

This does not contain the trinity nor the trinity doctrine. There simple is no verse in the Bible that reads The nature of God is a trinity - consisting of the father son and holy spirit who are co-substantial, co-equal in co-eternal - and if you do not believe this you cannot go to heaven but...

The trinity is not in the Bible - not the word, not the doctrine. And it goes against Scripture. See 1C. See John 17:3 How did you come to the conclusion the trinity is aligned with the word of God.

Appeal to Ad Hominem.

Jesus is certainly NOT the Creator for the Bible says he is the first born of all Creation and that he is the Son of the Creator, who created things FOR and THROUGH his son.

Flashing. God did not screw up. Trinitarian take on unitarian text is the screw up. The only God is Jesus' God. See Rev 1:1

I'm not JW but a unitarian Christian.

Sure but how are you reaching that conclusion from the text in question?

Jesus too was asked invalid or trick questions. He did not fall for them in either. I'm in good company. You put logic in quotes because you cannot simply admit your doctrine goes against logic definition language usage.

Using standard language usage and keeping 2 COR 1:13, in mind, (there is no hidden meaning in our letters) the inescapable conclusion or take away from the verse below is yes. Based on this verse, if you conclude the answer is no, what reading skills, logic and definitions supports that...

Invalid question no matter how many times you ask it. Words are WHAT’s not WHO’s. He words of the President are an attribute of the President, not another being related but apart from the man. Now, know you don’t like that answer but there it is.

Exactly right on every point! Thanks for the insightful post. I’ve been influenced by @theefaith’s repeated reference to what Jesus founded his church on. Jesus founded his church on the BIG REVEAL of being Gods Anointed. Jesus did NOT found his church on him being God incarnate.

Sorry Charlie. I answered your question. Accept it or not. It’s up to you.

Is there where I say thank you for your opinion? For the record, I don’t think I misinterpreted but took what you said differently than you meant. An example is when my kids would brag about how much fun they had at a place they where forbidden to go. Like you, they want me to focus on how...

You are confusing facts with opinion. Logic is the non-contradictory identification of truth. It is a tool that humans use, but is not any more human than sand. I'm afraid you are confusing reasoning with morals. God reveals truths & commands to us, not reasoning.