Search results

You invoke this tactic frequently; ask about something I JUST answered. Matt 16:18 has been exposed as one of many trinitarian deceptions on 2 fronts: Placed just before Jesus’ ascension is out of place and makes implausible the Apostles repeated disobedience of the risen Lord. Trinitarians...

But no sign of Jesus in either verse! Speaking a word is an attribute of a being. It is NOT a being. The words quoted above are not David in NJ; they are an attribute of David in NJ.

No. It is a False Alternative that the original Reformers fully addressed all the man made traditions in violation of Scripture. Predictable that you cannot admit the Marian doctrine is not found in Scripture. And no, Luke 1:28 does NOT explicitly teach what is the Marian doctrine.

This shows how completely void of Scriptural support the doctrine of the trinity is as John 1:1 does not even have Jesus in it. On top of that John 20:31 informs us that Johns entire Gospel was NOT written to claim God incarnated but that Jesus was the Messiah, the SON of God.

Fascinating.

Just admit the sources for Mary being sinless and an ever virgin are extra-Biblical, not the Word of God and irrelevant to salvation, then we can move on.

Great thread. I think there is confusion over 2 sets of ideals: Salvation v Sanctification Eternal v Temporal Consequences of Sin Although I am saved, I still Sin. Today, learned a bill was not paid on time, leading to the temporal consequence of a late fee added to my bill.

We understand it perfectly. It is you who deliberately confuses ‘one being’ with ‘being at one.’

And that is EXACTLY what trinitarian do in oppositionto his word which is completely void of the trinity and it’s doctrine.

Elohim simply means heavenly beings. It is a plural word. The fact that God is among the heavenly beings does not mean that God is plural. The Bible says God is alone over and over again. (BTW, although Isaiah said this, he is not God. As a prophet of God, like Jesus, he is speaking for God)...

Outstanding analysis! Thanks. Once again we see the desires of men to go against the desire of God - even among men who profess to be men of God.

Steve Cioccolanti said the over-arching message of the Bible is to choose life. In Genesis, there were 2 trees. Cioccolanti simplifies the 2 trees. One tree was the tree of life. There was the tree of life and the other tree. God, our Creator, commands us to choose life. In the NT, God sends...

LOL You are desperate. If there were a shred of Scriptural teaching explicit on the trinitarian doctrine - like 3 are co-equal, co-substantial or co-eternal - it would be the most quoted verse in the Bible. The delusion is so complete, you cannot even admit the trinity is not in the Bible - not...

Saying this does not make it true. You are substituting the word of God with trinitarianism. The Apostles did not Repeatedly Disobey the Risen Lord; he told them to baptize people in his name - not the name of F,S & HS - and that is what they did. Simple.

If what you are saying is true, you'd be able to present the verse that says something like The nature of God is a trinity - consisting of Father, Son & HS - and if you do not believe this, you cannot be saved but are damned to hell forever. It is such an important doctrine to the writers of...

Theefaith is so indoctrinated that he believes God said to obey men.

Exodus 3:14-15 does not say anything like The nature of God is a trinity - consisting of the Father, Son & HS - and if you do not believe this, you cannot be saved but are damned to hell forever.

What proof would you accept? Seems to me people take SHOULD these days to mean SHOULD NOT. You are absolutely right that resting one day of the week is a good practice. In high school and college, I worked every weekend in addition to going to school full time. Little rest during those 8 years...

You got it! Of course, trinitarians see 3 behind every blade of grass. So, there is that.

Ha! The truth is OUT despite all trinitarian attempts to impose its inherently contradictory doctrine onto unitarian text.