Search results

Great point. I would just add that it is not doctrinal differences that cause war. Thomas Jefferson famously said that if his neighbor believes in 10 gods or no gods, it neither picks his pocket or breaks his bones. Doctrinal purity is a higher priority for many Christians over loving others as...

Again, IF Jesus died for all, then universalism would be correct doctrine. Given there is a condition to be saved that the majority of human beings do not meet, it is absurd to say he died for all.

Moving the goal posts. They were worshipped. Now, what about answering my question?

Explained many times. Trinitarians want the statement to be declarative but it is obviously exclamatory. When I drop a wine glass on the flooe and yell, 'oh crap' others know I am not declaring the wine glass to be feces. Such tortured stretches is what trinitarians are left with as they know...

I addressed this elsewhere. It is a trinitarian notion that worship means one is a God but they are in denial David, Daniel and Neburchanazar were all men who were worshipped. Therefore, it proves nothing about the divinity of Jesus. By contrast 1 Corinthians 11:3 clearly states God is the head...

Undoubtedly, they will make a dualistic Appeal, such as Apples are oranges.

I suppose your question is RCC-centric. On another thread, a poster asked what would one think and due if they grew up on a deserted island with no contact with the outside world, and as an adult, happened upon a Bible? The explicit teaching in the Bible is to be Baptized, independent of any...

Since Christ died 15 centuries before, no one would expect authority to come from him. I'm content with the directives I receive directly from the Holy Spirit - even if they do not comply with RCC desire to control everyone.

Agreed. :)

Word games. The Bible does not teach believing in 'the eternal heavenly Trio' as any kind of condition to be saved.

There are so many verses flying around, it is hard to keep track of what verse is being referred to. However, if this is the verse, why don't you meet his challenge of a commentary? Obviously, you want your twisted interpretation to be taken as the obvious or only one. Let me give it a stab...

You should bow out as your replies are getting more and more absurd - even for a trinitarian.

Fine by me. I don't want to be a part of any organization that considers me out.

And trinitarians are deliberately confusing the word of God becoming flesh with God becoming flesh. When I sent my letter through the mail that is not the same thing as I went through the mail. I know you realize this but it does not fit with your doctrine, so you have to go around it. Word...

Words are not beings.

What a stretch! Perhaps you've been so indoctrinated that you cannot even separate or question the almighty God is perfectly capable of expressing words without relying on his Son; that the Word of God is an attribute of God and not a person at all. Also, you completely ignore how John 20:31...

Wow! Trinitarians deliberately misinterpret unitarian text of the entire Bible, written by monotheist Jews who reject the trinity to this . Wow. Just wow! When acts says God raised Jesus from the dead and selected him to judge the world, just how am I misinterpreting it?

Thank you. Indeed it has. 1 = 1. 3 = 3. I am saved by the Son who is Lord but not the Father who is LORD God.

Why is it said that Jesus fulfilled the law? It suggests it only needed to be fulfilled one time but doesn't it always have to be fulfilled, like always stopping at a stop sign for all drivers?

Another outstanding point! I predict silence. Truth that does not support their doctrine cannot be true. Doctrine before truth.