Search results

Not an answer to my question. It is not Bible truth to presume authority to condemn fellow believers.

It was prevailed before the 4th century.

... Despite it not being an explicit Biblical teaching. I just follow Jesus, read devotedly, pray incessantly, love God and others and spread the Good News by being all things to all people so that through me, some might be saved. However, what doctrines you hold to condemn me for not sharing...

1st, prove you know how to spell correctly. 2nd, it is imprudent to wait until proof has arrived before protecting yourself from the beast.

That is sad. When I'm not slaving away at the office, I try to have as much fun in my free time as possible. For instance, while others get worked up over politics, I find it an endless source of fun - such as pointing out the hypocrisy in politicians. I saw a meme this week that pointed out the...

Even you must accept there is a difference between the many lords in the Bible and the LORD God, who alone is the one true God almighty. Jesus called his Father the one true God in John 17:3. That's good enough for me.

So, your theory is subjective 'attitude' is what will prevent people from buying and selling and not some objective identifier, like a chip implant?

What fun would it be if we agreed on everything? :-)

Great question. Putting aside the difference between judgment and judgmental, the question of judging is one of the most misunderstood in all Christendom. Verse 2 makes is clear in modern English, the prohibition is against one of the only sins Jesus condemned, which is hypocrisy. Scripture...

If it sounds like a duck, looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, why do you seriously doubt that it is a duck?

No. The RCC was corrupted much sooner. 1 Tim 4:1 certainly applies to the corrupted RCC.

Except his authority was given by the One who sent him who is greater and knows more. This One is God and not Jesus.

Odd how this post keeps getting ignored. The questions reveal an inconvenient truth. Cricket .... Cricket ....

No. That is you reading into the text AGAIN. There are many lords in Scripture. That does not make them the LORD God.

No, I am not joking. See your thread on Marxism and socialism.

The perp and victim are the wrong race and gender to warrant significant media coverage.

That all the epistles identify God as the Father is strong prove the Son is not God. I doubt it is possible to write a stronger anti-trinitarian statement than Paul wrote in 1 Corinthians 8:6 ‘For us, there is one God, the Father.’

So, there IS scriptural support for Luther and the Reformation. Why do you call it so called? The Reformed church jettisoned the heavy yolk of Roman corruption.

That is NOT what Scripture says. LORD. Lord. Not the same.

Many kings throughout history are called lord. Does not make them God.