Search results

Yep and he used two words in the same context you keep ignoring my question can agape and phileo ever mean the same?

He is talking about the ability to perform miracles, It was not only given to peter, not even only to apostles,

So you place men equal,with Jesus? That’s where the first problem lies paul and peter and all apostles were men, who were not perfect, who had self will who still Sinned, and even had to call each other out because they were not perfect. Christ is perfect. He is the one who holds it all...

Show me a bible that seperates the different types of love in John 21, let’s start there

Can they ever mean the same ? Context did not change in the passage why two words? Why could peter not say he agaped him

Solid translation I know if a few. I use them all but that’s not what you said you said Pure. Ie perfect. Backtracking now?

Can you not answer my questions? Do they mean the same? Since they birth were translated with the same English word (love)

Oh it endures, it endures in many English texts, you just want to make an idle out of one text

Do agape and phileo mean the exact same thing? Are they equivalent words which can be used interchangeably because they are prickly equal with one another?

For THEIR local church THE church is built on Christ Jesus told peter, I now call you Petros (small stone or pebble) and on this Petra (large stone or boulder) I will build my church the rock the church was built on was not petro (little peter) but Petra, which was christ the son of the...

I already showed you how Jesus conversation with peter is not correct in any English version you look at. if it were to be truely interpreted. It would show how Jesus asked peter if he agape him, and Peters replay that he phileo him, and Jesus asked again, do you agape me, and peter again...

No, it said it is built on CHrist, Peter and the apostle are the foundation stones. The cornerstone (Christ is however, what any building is built on, without it, the building is weak and has no real foundation.

That’s what I thought when I read it, it sounded christian

It’s not the king James you do realize back in Jesus day they had scrolls not bibles correct? I believe they also used the Septuagint a lot.

Thank you I did not know this

But it’s false and it has no gospel in it,

If you read the Book of Mormon it uses what I call king James english. I am not sure what bible they use, I had a bible study with one about 20 years ago, out of respect I ready the Book of Mormon, I got about three quarters of the way through when it was so far out in left field it I could...

The perfect bible was given since then all we have are what the scribes have rewritten and interpretations of men it is perfect in that it can lead me to Christ and help make me Mature but the English bible is Missing some deep stuff.

If you think so. You really worry me. There is no gospel in the book if Mormon. It is a perverted made up book using king janes language where they are not even doing what God commanded

You do remember some of the KJV was translated from a Latin based Greek text so you not?