Search results

Good god I hope not! We call it Christianize when we here pastors in the radio talk KJV English lol. We get a laugh and ask if they teach you totally hate at in school

Why should I trust them more? They made a word for word bible the best they could. I do not fault them unfortunately the word can not fully be translated that way. But anyone who tries to change it gets attacked like people are doing here I give them credit. But I will not trust them...

I read the book or Mormon. The gospel is not found there. Only a perverted gospel

I was just Responding to what you said

I guess this answers a lot of questions wow man like wow

There are enough helps out there now one does not have to be fluent there are also enough teachers out there with years of study that can be trusted.

I am glad I was exposed to how poetic and deep the Greek is, and although when I used the KJV only as a kid, how I enjoyed it, it does not compair to the Greek

Easter is a false interpretation it is not the meaning of the word used For a supposed word for word translation, They hurt themselves by using the wrong word

Would not surprise me, at the time they still believed baptism was a sacrament if I remember right Saying one is immersed in Christ is far different than saying one is baptized in Christ sadly to many people take romans 6 to mean water baptism, which if they used the word immerse, it would...

I never said you did try to keep up yourself

Yep the autographs penned by the writers are perfect

Actually a false gospel has arisen because they did not interpret it. You are just unable to see any issue because YOU do not have a leg to stand on

I want precise. Close enough could not be close enough. You could be missing important info that’s all I meant

I am not the one touting one English translation as the only one the world can trust

I already mentioned some the lack of the proper form of the word love in Jesus talk with peter (Peter do you love me) Failing to interpret the Greek baptizo which has caused many a division if the Bible was translated correctly using all tools the nt would be almost twice as large as it is

Man has a responsibility to understand gods word. He is not held accountable if someone tells him wrong he is held responsible if he gets it wrong it is more dangerous to misunderstand a word because the English word or lack of language rules are misunderstood then to use textual criticism to...

Remember baptism is not even an English word it is a Greek word where they change the o (baptiso) to an e (baptize) and because they have done this we have had numerous beliefs about baptism created out of that mistake

The last phrase as written would be present (them that believe) not future The word received, become and born (vs13) are all in Aorist tense Which is not found in English the problem is you would have to add words to make it More precise Thus it would not be considered a word for word...

I am worried about the “close as possible” aspect. Is that close enough?

This would be a mistake the KJV is not as complete because of flaws in the language used