Search results

I doubt your ability to discern an exclamation from a revelation.

You do realize this is figurative language, right? Beings are not words.

Not to mention the trinity not mentioned in any of the 66 books of the Bible once. The idea is so important, it is not mentioned once!

Another doublespeak post or Appeal to False Alternative. I get it and reject contradictions.

No, what makes your viewpoint invalid, in and of itself, is that it is inherently contradictory. Do you realize that which is IN cannot be OUT? (Sure, change reference points, play word games but there it is)

My friend, you simply do not understand what this thread is about. The purpose of this thread is to STRENGTHEN the case against trinitarianism. If you want to debate it, feel free to post in the many other threads.

This is nowhere to be found in scripture - but is found in a flawed half a millennia old corruption. Already trolled in this thread. Already refuted. God, in his unitarian nature certifies the truth of His Son. 7 So there are three testifying witnesses: 8 the Spirit, the water, and the blood...

Verse of the day Acts 4:10,12 (The Voice) I want all of you and all of the people of Israel to know this man standing in front of you—obviously in good health—was healed by the authority of Jesus of Nazareth, the Anointed One. This is the same Jesus whom you crucified and whom God raised from...

Acts 13:29-33 says Jesus became the son of God AFTER the resurrection. An exclamation is not a revelation. "My God, that is a beautiful car." Exclamation, not revelation. I know atheists who exclaim 'My God' as they reach the pinnacle of the sex act. Exclamation, not revelation.

No. What does the singular pronoun 'me' signify? See 1C.

I'm not sure how a thread on authority morphed into the Catholic-Protestant debate. I know there is this other guy, theefaith or something, that pushes along the same line you do, reading 'and their successors' into the Scriptural text and things of the like. For me, the verse below is binding...

The pernicious lie of the God-man thesis is when it is asserted he is 'fully man.' Then they make an Appeal to Ignorance, we don't know how this is, you just have to accept it. The man-God, who is God incarnate is also fully man. So many mystical contradictions. Ridiculous. It amazes me that...

I reject the trinity. ‘God is greater than Jesus’ means Jesus is not God. As said, Jesus was favored by God in that he was given all authority AFTER he sacrificed himself. Sacrifice and obedience is a prerequisite to God’s favor.

This is the kind of double speak people hate. Compare normal language usage using the Titanic as an example. 'Charlie died to save everyone on the Titanic' is taken to mean no one died because of his heroics. To add the qualifier is to destroy the purpose for which he died. Effective use of...

We all see it, who are not indoctrinated with it.

In thread after thread you insert ‘and their successors’ into the text. I thank God our salvation does not depend on the RCC. So glad, the ministry of Jesus is not limited to that corrupt institution. The more the adversary tightens his grip, the more souls slip through his fingers. God...

I'm not sure I got an answer to those who advocate in the affirmative. IF Jesus died for the world with no exceptions, then universalism is correct, right?

Not reading details into the text. Just basic reading comprehension. To say Jack and Jill went up the hill, means they both did it. The question of greater authority and equality of testimony (beyond going up the hill) is besides the point. My wife and I, together, have helped people. I...

I don't see it as changing the situation at all since it is common to refer to couples as a unit. Point being, Paul referenced Priscilla specifically as someone who had better doctrinal authority than the man (along with her husband).

John 3:16 says what we all know; Jesus was begotten, not incarnated.