Search results

Are you really unaware of the Good News of Jesus Christ, that like him, we are the adopted, chosen elect children of God, who Jesus called us his brothers and sisters?! Oh my.

I've pointed it out many times. Trinitarians suppose figurative statements supersede literal statement on literal matters. John 8:24 has Jesus saying, 'Unless you believe I am who I have said I am,' which ≠ Jesus is God support.

Choosing no master, or more precisely, choosing oneself as master and god, is a choice, isn't it? Not sure what you got agains free will? Maybe you extend it to mean free from consequences? Agreed.

I've already answered this repeatedly. Jesus is the Savior of the world, the chosen Servant of God. Wrong! Judas of Iscariot is not Iscariot of Judas. Hunter is the son of Joe Biden. This does not make Hunter <Joe Biden>. Jesus is the adopted son of God as we all are. This makes no man God.

Again, wrong. Jesus WAS the only begotten son of God - as all first borns are.

Trinitarians forget one of Jesus' last words on the cross ... “My God, my God, why have you abandoned me?” My God is Jesus' God, the only God. For those who need a language refresher 'you' and 'me' are not synonyms but refer to different beings - except possibly in trinity land. God never...

Only Satan and his children are for the Trinity. See how assertions work?

I have no idea where you get the idea from that 61 translations affirm trinitarian interpretation of Scripture. John 1:1 does not even have Jesus in there. However, it is typical for trinitarians to read what is not there. I've posted several times the proper perspective to understand John 1:1...

Yes, it sure is off topic. Trinitarians want "The Son of God" to mean God in human flesh but the Bible does not say that. It repeatedly says God, the Father of Jesus. That is, God in his unitarian nature. The "Holy Spirt" is not a a 3rd person/being who gives grace and peace. May God our Father...

Hilarious how trinitarian suppose figurative language to have literal meaning. The Word is the word of God, not Jesus. The proper interpretation of John 1:1 is through Deuteronomy 18:15-18. That trinitarians push belief in this 4th century evolution over salvation, over the 1C tells the story.

Trinitarian dogma without Scriptural support.

Well, your posts are beginning to make me think some Christians might be in league with the devil. It would be great if you would not include unrelated to the topic. Thanks!

A trolling post. Jesus is not God and John 8:24 does not even assert that. Jesus is our only mediator to God. By definition, this means he cannot be God.

So, you are OK with God lying but not Jesus lying? Did you ever read in the Bible why Jesus spoke in so many parables, besides to fulfill prophecy? I'll look for the actual verse if you think it will help. However, the point is he deliberately spoke in ways he knew that unbelievers would not...

This has been addressed several times already. Jesus is the son of God - but not God. The Word is the word of God - but not literally God. It is understandable why trinitarians want to use figurative language to take on literal meaning. See Deuteronomy 18:15-18.

Well, just because we have to follow POTUS, does not mean we do not have to follow the orders of mayors or governors. For theological reasons, you want to pretend there is only one Lord when there are, in fact, many lords. Yet, there is only one LORD God. The Scriptures you referenced were NOT...

I'm glad you pointed this out. The purpose of this thread is to make the case AGAINST as I figured there might be a thread FOR. I don't know about you but I like to hear arguments for both sides. In civilized society, especially in court rooms, we don't let one side prevent the other side from...

Just basic reading comprehension my friend. The LORD said to my Lord = 1 being talking to another. From what I've seen, trinitarians make all kinds of semantic and logical juxtapositions. Does Jesus sit at the right hand of God?

You do realize focusing on the 'man is God' thesis does not make the case for 3is1ism, right?

I know of no more powerful an idol than to disregard the 1C's use of singular pronoun, and suppose the one God is three. (After all, that is what singular pronoun's attest to, singular, not triad, right?) That would have been the perfect time for God to say, you shall have no other God before...